28.03.2013 Views

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />

1987; Rodríguez Barreal et al., 2000), although in some <strong>of</strong> them the way in which<br />

the results are obtained is not specified, so comparison is difficult. In spite <strong>of</strong> this,<br />

in the research carried out in the street trees <strong>of</strong> Madrid (Rodríguez Barreal et al.,<br />

2000), black locust appears as not very desirable species. Otherwise, this was<br />

considered very advisable species in another survey (Raupp and Noland, 1984)<br />

since it did not suffer from pest problems unlike the present survey, where many<br />

black locust SYGs were affected by aphids and wood borer insects.<br />

Table 10. Ranking <strong>of</strong> ten least suitable tree and shrub species. Percentage <strong>of</strong> damaged<br />

SYGs, severity <strong>of</strong> disturbances (coefficient*number <strong>of</strong> disturbances) and final value, in all<br />

the years and in all the inventoried green spaces.<br />

Order<br />

1<br />

Tree species<br />

Robinia<br />

pseudoacacia<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

damaged<br />

SYGs<br />

Severity <strong>of</strong><br />

disturbances<br />

valuation<br />

Final<br />

value<br />

230<br />

Tree species<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

damaged<br />

SYGs<br />

Severity <strong>of</strong><br />

disturbances<br />

valuation<br />

Final<br />

value<br />

85,9 64,3 55,3 Nerium oleander 73,1 20,6 15,1<br />

2 Ulmus pumila 83,6 64,0 53,5 Cotoneaster sp. 60,0 20,9 12,5<br />

3 Acer negundo 88,0 47,0 41,4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Platanus x<br />

hispanica<br />

Populus alba var.<br />

fastigiata<br />

Eonymus<br />

europaeus<br />

84,2 12,2 10,3<br />

85,4 37,6 32,1 Pyracantha sp. 58,3 16,4 9,6<br />

95,7 32,0 30,6<br />

Pittosporum<br />

tobira<br />

55,0 16,7 9,2<br />

6 Populus nigra 100,0 24,2 24,2 Rosa sp. 60,7 14,6 8,9<br />

7<br />

Prunus cerasifera<br />

var. atropurpurea<br />

71,0 27,3 19,4<br />

8 Tilia platiphyllos 81,8 23,2 18,0<br />

Berberis<br />

thunbergii<br />

‘Atropurpurea’<br />

Rosmarinus<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficinalis<br />

70,4 11,8 8,3<br />

49,1 14,5 7,1<br />

9 Sophora japonica 77,8 22,0 18,0 Viburnum tinus 42,0 16,6 7,0<br />

10 Acer sp. 85,7 19,8 17,0 Mahonia aquifolia 50,0 7,9 4,0<br />

5. REFERENCES<br />

Agrios, G.N., 2005. Plant Pathology. 5 th Ed. San Diego, Ca: Elsevier Academic Press Publications,<br />

922 pp. ISBN 0-12-044565-4, p. 88<br />

Alvey, A.A., 2006. Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban Forestry &<br />

Urban Greening, 5, 195-201<br />

Ball, J., 1987. Efficient monitoring for an urban IPM program. Journal <strong>of</strong> Arboriculture, 13:7, 174-<br />

177<br />

Berrang, P., Karnosky, D.F. and Stanton, B.J., 1985. Environmental factors affecting tree health in<br />

New York City. Journal <strong>of</strong> Arboriculture, 11:6, 185-189<br />

Chacalo, A., Aldama A., Grabinsky, J., 1994. Street tree inventory in Mexico City. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Arboriculture, 20:6, 222-226<br />

Clark, J.R. et al., 1997. A model <strong>of</strong> urban forest sustainability. Journal <strong>of</strong> Arboriculture, 23:1, 17-30<br />

Cumming, A.B. et al., 2001. Forest Health Monitoring Protocol applied to roadside trees in Maryland.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Arboriculture, 27:3, 126-138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!