28.03.2013 Views

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />

designers or planners <strong>of</strong> the green spaces, since some disturbances such as sunburn<br />

lesions or leaning stems by light deficit are generally due to inadequate designs. In<br />

fact, in natural environment most <strong>of</strong> these problems are very unusual. For all these<br />

reasons, the municipal green spaces management programmes should be look<br />

through in order to adapt conservation strategies to deal better with abiotic<br />

problems.<br />

Besides, abiotic diseases were much less frequent in shrubs, with 20-48% <strong>of</strong><br />

total disturbances depending on the considered year. Aphids were responsible <strong>of</strong> a<br />

great number <strong>of</strong> the biotic diseases, since it was the second problem, after dead<br />

plants. However, this result would have been pretty different if dead plants had<br />

been considered as an abiotic or biotic agent.<br />

4.9 Abiotic diseases affect a greater rank <strong>of</strong> tree and shrubs species.<br />

Abiotic diseases affect a greater variety <strong>of</strong> species (Table 7), which is<br />

reasonable if it is taken into account the fact that they are prompted by human<br />

activities or physical agents. However, biotic diseases seemed to be more specific<br />

in some plant species; for example, lace bugs (Corythuca ciliata), leaf beetle<br />

Galerucella luteola and Pseudomonas syringae subsp. savastanoi affected only one<br />

species (plane tree, Siberian elm and oleander, respectively). Concerning pests, this<br />

result would confirm the idea held by some authors who maintain that most<br />

herbivorous pests are <strong>special</strong>ized and only eat few taxa <strong>of</strong> plants (Rocray, 1983;<br />

Galvin, 1999; Raupp et al., 2001).<br />

Table 7. Affected species by biotic and abiotic diseases. Tree and shrub species affected<br />

by biotic and abiotic diseases and the percentage <strong>of</strong> the total species, in all the years and in<br />

all the inventoried green spaces.<br />

Trees Total<br />

Affected by<br />

biotic<br />

diseases<br />

Affected by<br />

abiotic<br />

diseases<br />

228<br />

Shrubs Total<br />

Affected by<br />

biotic<br />

diseases<br />

Affected by<br />

abiotic<br />

diseases<br />

Species 73 38 57 Species 77 32 40<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

species<br />

100 52.1 78.1<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

species<br />

100 41,6 51,9<br />

4.10 Positive association between naturalness <strong>of</strong> tree species and their<br />

health status.<br />

Pyšek’s criteria are used to define the naturalness <strong>of</strong> the tree (Pyšek , 1995). It is<br />

considered the national scale, therefore, all those species defined as natural <strong>of</strong><br />

Spain according to those criteria, are classified as native in this survey.<br />

Bibliography is used to make easier this controversial task (López González, 2002;<br />

Real Jardín Botánico, <strong>2009</strong>).<br />

A ji-squared test on the data shows that the relationship between health status<br />

(damaged or undamaged SYG) and naturalness (native or exotic SYG) is<br />

significant at 95% level (Table 8). The probability for an exotic SYG to be<br />

damaged is greater (0.68) than the probability for a native SYG (0.59). However,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!