A. Status of the Spectacled Eider - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
A. Status of the Spectacled Eider - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
A. Status of the Spectacled Eider - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
emaining before <strong>the</strong> population reaches critically low levels. The choice <strong>of</strong> 125 pairs stems<br />
from <strong>the</strong> classification criteria proposed for use by <strong>the</strong> World Conservation Union (IUCN) for<br />
<strong>the</strong> category “critical” (Mace <strong>and</strong> Stuart 1994).<br />
Biologists are aware that, when populations reach very low levels, population parameters are<br />
likely to change. For example, birth rates may change because <strong>of</strong> difficulty in finding mates<br />
or for colonial species survival rates may decline because <strong>of</strong> difficulties in defending territories<br />
against predators. If <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> population decline is unknown (<strong>the</strong> case for <strong>Spectacled</strong><br />
<strong>Eider</strong>s), time will be required to find <strong>the</strong> cause(s) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decline. The most productive<br />
research will occur with population sizes higher than this critical level. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong><br />
useful management actions is greatly reduced at very small population sizes. By <strong>the</strong> time a<br />
population reaches 125 pairs <strong>the</strong> most serious management option is taking <strong>the</strong> remaining birds<br />
into a captive breeding program. This is a particularly undesirable outcome if <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
decline is still unknown. It is <strong>the</strong>refore useful to know how much time is available before<br />
critical levels are reached.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simulations are shown in Figure 1-4. Criteria for classification as<br />
endangered are usually defined in terms <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r probabilities <strong>of</strong> extinction or population<br />
growth rates. Various criteria have been proposed for classification as endangered (Shaffer<br />
1981; Mace <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong>e 1991; Mace et al. 1992). The Mace <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong>e (1991) criteria IUCN<br />
wI-<br />
I— 0.9<br />
0)<br />
~ 0.8 -<br />
z<br />
00.7-<br />
Cntical<br />
— — 9~<br />
‘U<br />
~ 0.6<br />
I-<br />
2 w 0.5<br />
0<br />
w 0.4<br />
a-<br />
~ 0.3 -<br />
0.2<br />
‘Extinct<br />
~0.1<br />
U 0<br />
o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400<br />
TIME (YEARS) FROM 1995<br />
Figure 1-4. Cumulative probability curves for <strong>the</strong> time to reach critical (125 pairs) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
time to extinction.<br />
Appendix I - Page 10