29.03.2013 Views

A. Status of the Spectacled Eider - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

A. Status of the Spectacled Eider - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

A. Status of the Spectacled Eider - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

emaining before <strong>the</strong> population reaches critically low levels. The choice <strong>of</strong> 125 pairs stems<br />

from <strong>the</strong> classification criteria proposed for use by <strong>the</strong> World Conservation Union (IUCN) for<br />

<strong>the</strong> category “critical” (Mace <strong>and</strong> Stuart 1994).<br />

Biologists are aware that, when populations reach very low levels, population parameters are<br />

likely to change. For example, birth rates may change because <strong>of</strong> difficulty in finding mates<br />

or for colonial species survival rates may decline because <strong>of</strong> difficulties in defending territories<br />

against predators. If <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> population decline is unknown (<strong>the</strong> case for <strong>Spectacled</strong><br />

<strong>Eider</strong>s), time will be required to find <strong>the</strong> cause(s) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decline. The most productive<br />

research will occur with population sizes higher than this critical level. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong><br />

useful management actions is greatly reduced at very small population sizes. By <strong>the</strong> time a<br />

population reaches 125 pairs <strong>the</strong> most serious management option is taking <strong>the</strong> remaining birds<br />

into a captive breeding program. This is a particularly undesirable outcome if <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

decline is still unknown. It is <strong>the</strong>refore useful to know how much time is available before<br />

critical levels are reached.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simulations are shown in Figure 1-4. Criteria for classification as<br />

endangered are usually defined in terms <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r probabilities <strong>of</strong> extinction or population<br />

growth rates. Various criteria have been proposed for classification as endangered (Shaffer<br />

1981; Mace <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong>e 1991; Mace et al. 1992). The Mace <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong>e (1991) criteria IUCN<br />

wI-<br />

I— 0.9<br />

0)<br />

~ 0.8 -<br />

z<br />

00.7-<br />

Cntical<br />

— — 9~<br />

‘U<br />

~ 0.6<br />

I-<br />

2 w 0.5<br />

0<br />

w 0.4<br />

a-<br />

~ 0.3 -<br />

0.2<br />

‘Extinct<br />

~0.1<br />

U 0<br />

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400<br />

TIME (YEARS) FROM 1995<br />

Figure 1-4. Cumulative probability curves for <strong>the</strong> time to reach critical (125 pairs) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

time to extinction.<br />

Appendix I - Page 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!