29.03.2013 Views

A. Status of the Spectacled Eider - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

A. Status of the Spectacled Eider - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

A. Status of the Spectacled Eider - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How do <strong>the</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> demographic possibilities affect our ability to test hypo<strong>the</strong>ses<br />

about <strong>the</strong> cause(s) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decline? As mentioned, <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> new nesters could be used<br />

to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r adult survival or lack <strong>of</strong> recruitment was <strong>the</strong> primary cause <strong>of</strong>decline.<br />

Incorporating <strong>the</strong> uncertainty in parameters reduces our ability to detect differences between<br />

<strong>the</strong>se alternatives (Figure 111-9). Clearly, if <strong>the</strong> proportion new nesters/total nesters is greater<br />

than 0.22, <strong>the</strong>n reduced adult survival is likely whereas if this proportion is less than 0.12,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n reduced recruitment (ei<strong>the</strong>r reduced fertility or reduced first-year survival) is <strong>the</strong> likely<br />

cause. Although <strong>the</strong>re is some overlap between <strong>the</strong> distribution for reduction in adult survival<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> distributions for reduced recruitment, it is anticipated that actual estimates from<br />

<strong>Spectacled</strong> <strong>Eider</strong>s will reduce <strong>the</strong> range for demographic parameters <strong>and</strong> tighten <strong>the</strong>se<br />

distributions. Thus, it is still possible that <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> first-time nesters could be a useful<br />

diagnostic statistic.<br />

Ci~ 0.4<br />

‘U<br />

1— 0.35<br />

(0<br />

‘U<br />

z 0.3<br />

-J<br />

~0. 25<br />

0<br />

~0.2<br />

(0<br />

~0. 15<br />

I-<br />

0.1<br />

~0. 05<br />

‘U<br />

z 0<br />

PERCENTILES OF 95%<br />

THE DISTRIBUTION<br />

50%<br />

Figure ~-9. The proportion <strong>of</strong> nesters which are first-time nesters, assuming <strong>the</strong> decline was<br />

caused by a reduction in: first-year survival only, adult survival only, <strong>and</strong> fertility only. The<br />

squares represent <strong>the</strong> following percentiles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distributions: 5%, 50%, 95%. The percentiles<br />

are <strong>the</strong> same for first-year survival <strong>and</strong> fertility because both have <strong>the</strong> same effect on recmitment<br />

into <strong>the</strong> breeding population.<br />

5%<br />

FIRST-YEAR SURVIVAL ADULT SURVIVAL FERTILiTY<br />

PARAMETERS OF CHANGE<br />

Despite large uncertainty in demographic parameters, <strong>the</strong> basic life history strategy <strong>of</strong> eiders is<br />

still quite clear (Figure 111-10). Population growth is most sensitive to changes in adult<br />

survival, followed distantly by fertility <strong>and</strong> juvenile survival. Regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Appendix m - Page 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!