29.03.2013 Views

JESUS CHRIST: GOD-MAN - Vital Christianity

JESUS CHRIST: GOD-MAN - Vital Christianity

JESUS CHRIST: GOD-MAN - Vital Christianity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

188<br />

"'But I say to all of you: In the future you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right<br />

hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.' Then the high priest<br />

tore his clothes and said, 'He has spoken blasphemy! Why do we need any more<br />

witnesses? Look, now you have heard the blasphemy. What do you think?' 'He is<br />

worthy of death,' they answered" (Mt 26:64-66).<br />

Blasphemy—unless it were true! The "Son of Man" is hardly a mere man, but a divine<br />

being who is coming in the Father's glory to judge the world and to bring all history to an end.<br />

On a couple of occasions this title is used to refer to the present work of Jesus and His<br />

claim to be both Lord of the Sabbath and the forgiver of sins (Mk 2:23-28). Thus this<br />

designation is coupled to the ministry which only belongs to God Himself. Who but God has the<br />

right to define the Sabbath and to forgive sin?<br />

day.<br />

The rabbis understood this all too well. Rabbi Eliezer stated around A.D. 160:<br />

"God saw that a man, son of a woman, was to come forward in the future, who<br />

would attempt to make himself God and to lead the whole world astray. And if he<br />

says he is God he is a liar. And he will lead men astray, and say that he will depart<br />

and will return at the end of days."4<br />

Another Rabbi by the name of Abbahu of Caesarea wrote around A.D. 260:<br />

"If a man says 'I am God,' he is a liar; 'I am the Son of man' his end will be such that<br />

he will regret it; 'I shall ascend into heaven,' will it not be that he spoke and will<br />

not perform it?"5<br />

There is no question as to the divine connotation that the title "Son of Man" had in Jesus'<br />

Eduard Schweizer and I. Howard Marshall suggest that Jesus ". . . adopted the term Son<br />

of Man just because it was an ambiguous term, revealing as well as hiding."6<br />

Though in view of His explicit reference to Daniel's "abomination of desolation" in the<br />

Olivet Discourse (Mt 24:15; Mk 13:14) and His allusions to the imagery of Daniel 7:13 in that<br />

same discourse (Mk 13:26) and in His reply before the Sanhedrin (14:62), both with reference to<br />

the Son of Man, it becomes clear that Daniel 7 was the source upon which Jesus based His own<br />

understanding and to which He pointed in His use of the title.<br />

By using this title Jesus showed Himself to be the one in whom this vision of Daniel was<br />

to proceed to its realization. And in so doing, He possessed a title which combined both suffering<br />

and glory—which pointed to both aspects of His redemptive ministry as the God-Man.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!