29.03.2013 Views

JESUS CHRIST: GOD-MAN - Vital Christianity

JESUS CHRIST: GOD-MAN - Vital Christianity

JESUS CHRIST: GOD-MAN - Vital Christianity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

278<br />

Some argue that the enemies of Jesus had stolen His body. If they did, all they had to do<br />

to dismiss the apostles' claim that Jesus had risen from the dead, was to have produced Jesus'<br />

body or to have alluded to the fact that they had taken it. No evidence exists that the Jews ever<br />

used this strategy against the early church. Their only counterargument implies that they did not<br />

take Jesus' body (Mt 28:11-15). No motive could explain such silence if, in fact, they had taken<br />

Jesus' body.<br />

Thus naturalistic explanations are inadequate in explaining away the resurrection<br />

narrative.<br />

Most scholars are agreed that Joseph of Arimathea was a real, historical person and that<br />

Jesus was actually buried in his tomb.37 The gospels point out that he was a member of the<br />

Sanhedrin, a group of 71 leaders whose members were very well known among the populace.<br />

Why would anyone have invented a person who did not exist and say he was on the Sanhedrin if<br />

such were not the case since almost everyone knew who served on the Sanhedrin. If this were a<br />

fictitious character, it would have been much more plausible to propose someone who was<br />

obscure.<br />

There was no good reason to make up the story that Jesus was buried in Joseph's tomb.<br />

Probably the only logical reason would be to give prestige and authority to a major leader in the<br />

church. But if the early church was led by men who were deceivers, there is no evidence that<br />

Joseph was a significant leader in early <strong>Christianity</strong>.<br />

Because Joseph was a public figure, people would have known him, or known of him,<br />

and the location of the tomb. Therefore, if Jesus would not have been buried in his tomb, this<br />

would have been easy to verify. Thus to mention such a public figure would have been<br />

problematic if he had been fabricated.<br />

Joseph is called rich in the biblical text, and archeological discoveries have confirmed<br />

that only rich people in New Testament times owned the kind of tombs described in the burial<br />

account. John also tells us that Jesus' tomb was located in a garden. Again archeology has<br />

confirmed that this was characteristic of the tombs of prominent or wealthy people.<br />

Paul Maier, historian at Western Michigan University, sums up his assessment:<br />

"Accordingly, if all the evidence is weighed carefully and fairly, it is indeed<br />

justifiable, according to the canons of historical research, to conclude that the<br />

tomb of Joseph of Arimathea, in which Jesus was buried, was actually empty<br />

on the morning of the first Easter. And no shred of evidence has yet been<br />

discovered in literary sources, epigraphy, or archeology that would disprove<br />

this statement."38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!