29.03.2013 Views

JESUS CHRIST: GOD-MAN - Vital Christianity

JESUS CHRIST: GOD-MAN - Vital Christianity

JESUS CHRIST: GOD-MAN - Vital Christianity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196<br />

● "and the Word was God" (Jn 1:1).<br />

Jehovah Witnesses and other cults claim that John writes of two gods: one who is<br />

definite, with the article ("the God"), and one indefinite, without the article ("god" or "a god").<br />

Thus their New World Translation of John 1:1 reads:<br />

"In [the beginning] the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was<br />

a god."<br />

Such a translation is grammatically impossible. It does not take the syntax of the Greek<br />

seriously and thus is intellectually dishonest. According to Greek grammar (called "the Colvell's<br />

rule" which has been accepted for over half a century now as a genuine contribution to the field<br />

of biblical Greek scholarship):<br />

". . . the definite predicate nominative does not have the article when it precedes<br />

the verb; it only has the article when it follows the verb. It is indefinite only when<br />

the context demands it."16<br />

In the phrase, "God was the Word," the predicate nominative (God) comes before the<br />

verb (was) allowing for (God) to be definite. "Was" is an intransitive verb. Intransitives take no<br />

objects but instead predicate nominatives which refer back to the subject (in this case logos or<br />

"Word"). There are numerous examples (282 times) where definite predicate nouns precede the<br />

verb without an article (Mt 5:9; Lk 1:35, 78; 2:40; Jn 1:6, 12-13, 18; 3:2, 21; 8:54; 9:33; Ro 1:7,<br />

17,18; 1 Co 15:10; 2 Co 5:19; Php 2:11; Titus 1:1; etc.).<br />

The shift from ton theon (the accusative form of ho theos) to the anarthrous theos in John<br />

1:1 only indicates a shift in nuance, not a shift of substance. This means that logos (the Word) is<br />

called "God" in the fullest sense even though logos should not be identified with the person of<br />

God the Father. Such a shift from ho theos (the God) to theos (God) in a short space in Scripture<br />

normally does not indicate a major change of meaning. This is evident by the following<br />

examples:<br />

● ". . . You as a teacher have come from God [apo theou] because no one can perform<br />

these signs that You perform unless God [ho theos] is with Him" (Jn 3:2).<br />

● "[Jesus] knowing . . . that He came from God [apo theou] and was returning to God<br />

[pros ton theon]. . ." (13:3).<br />

● ". . . although they knew God [ton theon], they did not glorify Him as God [theon] . . ."<br />

(Ro 1:21).<br />

● ". . . how you turned to God [pros ton theon] from idols to serve the living and true<br />

God [theon]" (1 Th 1:9).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!