04.04.2013 Views

[ccebook.cn]The World in 2010

[ccebook.cn]The World in 2010

[ccebook.cn]The World in 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Europe<br />

New twists <strong>in</strong> an old saga<br />

Nov 13th 2009<br />

Europe struggles to free itself from dependence on Russian energy<br />

Russian gas had a bad year <strong>in</strong> 2009. Its share of the European market shrank: with demand weak, customers were<br />

able to switch to cheaper suppliers. But the Kreml<strong>in</strong> will once aga<strong>in</strong> be on the front foot <strong>in</strong> <strong>2010</strong>. Its top priority will<br />

be to get work started on the Nord Stream pipel<strong>in</strong>e, which will l<strong>in</strong>k Russia to Germany along the Baltic seabed,<br />

bypass<strong>in</strong>g troublesome transit countries such as Ukra<strong>in</strong>e and Poland. Russia’s debt-ridden gas giant, Gazprom, lacks<br />

the money to build this, so it needs help from the European Union and Germany.<br />

Russia’s heavy-handed energy diplomacy is often counterproductive. But it is lobby<strong>in</strong>g hard for Nord Stream and will<br />

probably be successful. In <strong>2010</strong> it will <strong>in</strong>crease pressure on Sweden and F<strong>in</strong>land, both of which have raised<br />

environmental concerns. It will also call on support from its most powerful European ally, Germany.<br />

Germany’s re-elected chancellor, the canny Angela Merkel, privately dislikes the project. But she knows she cannot<br />

block it outright: Germany’s energy-thirsty <strong>in</strong>dustry is desperate to have a reliable supply of gas from the east.<br />

Instead, she will push for a compromise. Germany will get Nord Stream built—if necessary with money from the<br />

European Union. But it will also push hard for work to start on another pipel<strong>in</strong>e, Nabucco. This would connect the gasrich<br />

Caspian region with central Europe, via Turkey and the Balkans. Russia’s alternative pipel<strong>in</strong>e across the Black Sea,<br />

South Stream, will get nowhere. It is too expensive.<br />

Ty<strong>in</strong>g up the loose ends on Nabucco will be the ma<strong>in</strong> energy story <strong>in</strong> southern Europe <strong>in</strong> <strong>2010</strong>. Turkey needs to be<br />

brought fully on board. That will mean its agree<strong>in</strong>g to take some Russian gas from Blue Stream, the under-used<br />

pipel<strong>in</strong>e across the Black Sea. Putt<strong>in</strong>g Russian gas <strong>in</strong> Nabucco dilutes its importance as a counterweight to Russia’s<br />

monopoly on east-west gas supplies. But it is better than noth<strong>in</strong>g. It will allow gas from Kurdistan (<strong>in</strong> Iraq), Azerbaijan<br />

and other sources to reach Europe directly, for the first time. <strong>The</strong> EU is determ<strong>in</strong>ed to get Nabucco built, even if the<br />

deal beh<strong>in</strong>d it is imperfect.<br />

Russia has another pipel<strong>in</strong>e to play with: OPAL. This would connect Nord Stream to the<br />

centre of Germany. In <strong>2010</strong> it will be clear that the Czech government has signed up to this<br />

-108-<br />

<strong>The</strong> weakest l<strong>in</strong>k<br />

<strong>in</strong> the West will

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!