[ccebook.cn]The World in 2010
[ccebook.cn]The World in 2010
[ccebook.cn]The World in 2010
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
This po<strong>in</strong>ts to another vulnerability. <strong>The</strong> coalition Mr Obama marshalled <strong>in</strong> 2008 around the allur<strong>in</strong>g but<br />
ambiguous banner of “change” will spl<strong>in</strong>ter. <strong>The</strong> most ideological members of that coalition are already<br />
dismayed by “betrayals” such as the president’s <strong>in</strong>action on causes such as gay marriage, and by policy calls<br />
such as the cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g detention of suspected terrorists without trial. Disappo<strong>in</strong>ted expectations will keep some<br />
of them at home <strong>in</strong> the mid-term congressional elections <strong>in</strong> November. Other stay-at-homes will <strong>in</strong>clude many<br />
of those first-time voters, ma<strong>in</strong>ly the black and the young, who <strong>in</strong> 2008 were electrified by his person rather<br />
than his policies. Many are likely to take the view that they did enough when they sent Mr Obama to the<br />
White House. Unexcited by the <strong>in</strong>s and outs of cap-and-trade and health-care legislation, and by an election <strong>in</strong><br />
which Mr Obama’s own job is not up for grabs, why should they turn out aga<strong>in</strong>?<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the compla<strong>in</strong>t of the left is that Mr Obama is govern<strong>in</strong>g from the centre, you might expect the selfdescribed<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent voters who backed Mr Obama <strong>in</strong> 2008 to stay with the Democrats <strong>in</strong> the mid-terms.<br />
Th<strong>in</strong>k aga<strong>in</strong>. A number of <strong>in</strong>dependents will feel no less betrayed by Mr Obama than<br />
the left already does. <strong>The</strong> Republican message that Mr Obama has presided over the<br />
biggest expansion of government for decades, and that he has done noth<strong>in</strong>g to re<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> the Democratic Party’s worst partisans and protectionists on Capitol Hill, will ga<strong>in</strong><br />
traction. A good number of Americans <strong>in</strong> the middle of politics are furious at the<br />
spectacle of Wall Street be<strong>in</strong>g bailed out while so many ord<strong>in</strong>ary Joes are los<strong>in</strong>g their<br />
Copyright © 2009 <strong>The</strong> Economist Newspaper and <strong>The</strong> Economist Group. All rights reserved.<br />
A good number of<br />
Americans <strong>in</strong> the<br />
middle of politics<br />
are furious<br />
jobs, homes and pensions. Hard times <strong>in</strong> <strong>2010</strong> will ensure that their anger is not go<strong>in</strong>g to subside quickly.<br />
Mr Obama will f<strong>in</strong>d no consolation on the world stage. Whatever his long-term decisions on Afghanistan and<br />
Iraq, American forces will still be suffer<strong>in</strong>g casualties <strong>in</strong> both countries <strong>in</strong> <strong>2010</strong>. In his second year it will<br />
become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly clear to people at home that America risks los<strong>in</strong>g its status as the world’s sole<br />
superpower and undisputed top nation as its relative economic power wanes. This trend may be <strong>in</strong>exorable<br />
with the rise of new powers <strong>in</strong> Asia, but that will not stop voters from blam<strong>in</strong>g the fellow <strong>in</strong> the White House.<br />
Los<strong>in</strong>g his House?<br />
Above all, the result of November’s mid-term elections will reflect the fact that even an economic crisis of<br />
extra-ord<strong>in</strong>ary proportions cannot make most Americans ditch their <strong>in</strong>gra<strong>in</strong>ed belief <strong>in</strong> a free-market system<br />
and embrace bigger government. <strong>The</strong> perception that Mr Obama is tilt<strong>in</strong>g too far left will cost the Democrats a<br />
host of seats. Although the Senate will rema<strong>in</strong> out of the Republicans’ reach, they might take control of the<br />
House of Representatives. No fewer than 84 of the Democrats’ seats <strong>in</strong> the House represent districts that were<br />
won by George Bush <strong>in</strong> 2004 or Senator John McCa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2008; they could turn Republican aga<strong>in</strong>.<br />
It is worth remember<strong>in</strong>g that a miserable <strong>2010</strong> does not mean that Mr Obama will necessarily fail to w<strong>in</strong> reelection<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2012, or that his presidency is dest<strong>in</strong>ed to be remembered as a failure. Other presidents, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Ronald Reagan and Bill Cl<strong>in</strong>ton, managed to bounce back from wretched second years and setbacks <strong>in</strong> the<br />
mid-terms. But the com<strong>in</strong>g year will be a try<strong>in</strong>g one for America’s no-longer-so-fresh new president.<br />
Peter David: Wash<strong>in</strong>gton bureau chief, <strong>The</strong> Economist<br />
-20-