04.04.2013 Views

[ccebook.cn]The World in 2010

[ccebook.cn]The World in 2010

[ccebook.cn]The World in 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This po<strong>in</strong>ts to another vulnerability. <strong>The</strong> coalition Mr Obama marshalled <strong>in</strong> 2008 around the allur<strong>in</strong>g but<br />

ambiguous banner of “change” will spl<strong>in</strong>ter. <strong>The</strong> most ideological members of that coalition are already<br />

dismayed by “betrayals” such as the president’s <strong>in</strong>action on causes such as gay marriage, and by policy calls<br />

such as the cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g detention of suspected terrorists without trial. Disappo<strong>in</strong>ted expectations will keep some<br />

of them at home <strong>in</strong> the mid-term congressional elections <strong>in</strong> November. Other stay-at-homes will <strong>in</strong>clude many<br />

of those first-time voters, ma<strong>in</strong>ly the black and the young, who <strong>in</strong> 2008 were electrified by his person rather<br />

than his policies. Many are likely to take the view that they did enough when they sent Mr Obama to the<br />

White House. Unexcited by the <strong>in</strong>s and outs of cap-and-trade and health-care legislation, and by an election <strong>in</strong><br />

which Mr Obama’s own job is not up for grabs, why should they turn out aga<strong>in</strong>?<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the compla<strong>in</strong>t of the left is that Mr Obama is govern<strong>in</strong>g from the centre, you might expect the selfdescribed<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent voters who backed Mr Obama <strong>in</strong> 2008 to stay with the Democrats <strong>in</strong> the mid-terms.<br />

Th<strong>in</strong>k aga<strong>in</strong>. A number of <strong>in</strong>dependents will feel no less betrayed by Mr Obama than<br />

the left already does. <strong>The</strong> Republican message that Mr Obama has presided over the<br />

biggest expansion of government for decades, and that he has done noth<strong>in</strong>g to re<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> the Democratic Party’s worst partisans and protectionists on Capitol Hill, will ga<strong>in</strong><br />

traction. A good number of Americans <strong>in</strong> the middle of politics are furious at the<br />

spectacle of Wall Street be<strong>in</strong>g bailed out while so many ord<strong>in</strong>ary Joes are los<strong>in</strong>g their<br />

Copyright © 2009 <strong>The</strong> Economist Newspaper and <strong>The</strong> Economist Group. All rights reserved.<br />

A good number of<br />

Americans <strong>in</strong> the<br />

middle of politics<br />

are furious<br />

jobs, homes and pensions. Hard times <strong>in</strong> <strong>2010</strong> will ensure that their anger is not go<strong>in</strong>g to subside quickly.<br />

Mr Obama will f<strong>in</strong>d no consolation on the world stage. Whatever his long-term decisions on Afghanistan and<br />

Iraq, American forces will still be suffer<strong>in</strong>g casualties <strong>in</strong> both countries <strong>in</strong> <strong>2010</strong>. In his second year it will<br />

become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly clear to people at home that America risks los<strong>in</strong>g its status as the world’s sole<br />

superpower and undisputed top nation as its relative economic power wanes. This trend may be <strong>in</strong>exorable<br />

with the rise of new powers <strong>in</strong> Asia, but that will not stop voters from blam<strong>in</strong>g the fellow <strong>in</strong> the White House.<br />

Los<strong>in</strong>g his House?<br />

Above all, the result of November’s mid-term elections will reflect the fact that even an economic crisis of<br />

extra-ord<strong>in</strong>ary proportions cannot make most Americans ditch their <strong>in</strong>gra<strong>in</strong>ed belief <strong>in</strong> a free-market system<br />

and embrace bigger government. <strong>The</strong> perception that Mr Obama is tilt<strong>in</strong>g too far left will cost the Democrats a<br />

host of seats. Although the Senate will rema<strong>in</strong> out of the Republicans’ reach, they might take control of the<br />

House of Representatives. No fewer than 84 of the Democrats’ seats <strong>in</strong> the House represent districts that were<br />

won by George Bush <strong>in</strong> 2004 or Senator John McCa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2008; they could turn Republican aga<strong>in</strong>.<br />

It is worth remember<strong>in</strong>g that a miserable <strong>2010</strong> does not mean that Mr Obama will necessarily fail to w<strong>in</strong> reelection<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2012, or that his presidency is dest<strong>in</strong>ed to be remembered as a failure. Other presidents, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Ronald Reagan and Bill Cl<strong>in</strong>ton, managed to bounce back from wretched second years and setbacks <strong>in</strong> the<br />

mid-terms. But the com<strong>in</strong>g year will be a try<strong>in</strong>g one for America’s no-longer-so-fresh new president.<br />

Peter David: Wash<strong>in</strong>gton bureau chief, <strong>The</strong> Economist<br />

-20-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!