30.06.2013 Views

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6. Producing <strong>the</strong> report The final opportunity for analysis. Selection <strong>of</strong> vivid, compelling<br />

extract examples, final analysis <strong>of</strong> selected extracts, relating back<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysis to <strong>the</strong> research question and literature, producing<br />

a scholarly report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysis.<br />

Phase One<br />

In <strong>the</strong> first phase, <strong>the</strong> researcher is required to familiarise him/her self with <strong>the</strong><br />

collected material. Familiarisation means reading and re-reading <strong>the</strong> data many<br />

times. In this phase Braun and Clark (2006) suggest noting down initial ideas<br />

which step out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reading, including noting down broad subject areas which<br />

begin <strong>the</strong> deconstruction process.<br />

Braun and Clarke (2006) suggest that pre-forming ideas based on reading <strong>of</strong><br />

literature can lead <strong>the</strong> researcher to come to conclusions about <strong>the</strong> nodes too<br />

soon. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong>y advise that reading <strong>the</strong> literature before coding<br />

<strong>the</strong> data can be useful because <strong>the</strong> researcher is better informed about coding<br />

choices and has a clearer understanding <strong>of</strong> where things fit. While <strong>the</strong>y do not<br />

prefer ei<strong>the</strong>r pre-forming or informing, <strong>the</strong> researcher is cautioned to be aware<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> prejudging <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>mes based on <strong>the</strong> literature<br />

review (Braun & Clarke, 2006).<br />

Adams, Khan, Wayside and White (2007) suggest that reading <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

research is essential to enable <strong>the</strong> researcher to formulate an awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

conceptual framework in which <strong>the</strong> research is located. Consequently, I decided<br />

to read <strong>the</strong> literature first which helped me to formulate my areas <strong>of</strong> interest in<br />

relation to <strong>the</strong> interviews and documents. This helped me to ask probing and<br />

relevant questions <strong>of</strong> interviewees and helped me to understand <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> written data which were collected.<br />

Phase Two<br />

The second phase required <strong>the</strong> coding <strong>of</strong> interesting features <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data in a<br />

systematic fashion across <strong>the</strong> entire data set and collating data relevant to each<br />

code. This can be done manually or with <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> several computer s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

programmes which are available. Such programmes allowed <strong>the</strong> researcher to<br />

make codes, or electronic piles <strong>of</strong> data which related to <strong>the</strong> same subject. The<br />

computer can be used later to interrogate <strong>the</strong> contents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electronic plies.<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!