30.06.2013 Views

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In a study conducted by <strong>the</strong> Commonwealth Fund (2010), New Zealand’s<br />

largely publicly funded health system was compared to Australian, Dutch, USA,<br />

Canadian, German and British health systems for equity, access, quality,<br />

efficiency and life expectancy. The Dutch health services scored <strong>the</strong> highest in<br />

all categories (Davis, et al., 2010). This success was credited to <strong>the</strong> national<br />

health reforms <strong>of</strong> 2006 which introduced a compulsory income-related health<br />

insurance system. Care was funded by a mix <strong>of</strong> mandatory public insurance<br />

and voluntary private insurance. The Dutch government introduced an income-<br />

related monthly allowance for two-thirds <strong>of</strong> Dutch households to make <strong>the</strong><br />

insurances affordable (Schut & van de Ven, 2011).<br />

The Commonwealth Fund found that New Zealand has <strong>the</strong> highest ranking<br />

among countries in <strong>the</strong> study for quality <strong>of</strong> care. This measure arises from<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> effective care, safe care, coordinated care, and patient-<br />

centred care (Davis, et al., 2010). New Zealand’s highest quality standards<br />

were achieved despite having <strong>the</strong> lowest health expenditure per capita cost in<br />

<strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> seven countries.<br />

These results indicate that quality health services are not necessarily linked to<br />

high levels <strong>of</strong> expenditure. In <strong>the</strong> same study, New Zealand ranked sixth <strong>of</strong><br />

seven (next to <strong>the</strong> USA) in <strong>the</strong> equity category (Davis, et al., 2010). In <strong>the</strong><br />

report, equity was defined by <strong>the</strong> US Institute <strong>of</strong> Medicine as “providing care<br />

that <strong>does</strong> not vary in quality because <strong>of</strong> personal characteristics such as<br />

gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic status” (Quality <strong>of</strong><br />

Health Care in America, 2001). In relation to <strong>the</strong>se comparator countries in <strong>the</strong><br />

study, New Zealand provides very cost-effective care <strong>of</strong> high quality, but fails to<br />

provide health care in <strong>the</strong> public sector to all citizens equitably.<br />

International Attempts to Ration Pharmaceuticals by <strong>Exceptional</strong><br />

Circumstances<br />

In a New Zealand <strong>the</strong>sis for a Masters Degree in 2009, Dr. Dilky Rasiah, <strong>the</strong><br />

Deputy Medical Director <strong>of</strong> PHARMAC, outlined <strong>the</strong> international attempts to<br />

ration medicines to individuals by means <strong>of</strong> exceptional circumstances<br />

schemes. The conclusions <strong>of</strong> Rasiah’s research are discussed on page 48 <strong>of</strong><br />

this <strong>the</strong>sis.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!