30.06.2013 Views

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

No information was provided on <strong>the</strong> application form about <strong>the</strong> rarity, reaction to<br />

alternative treatment or unusual combination <strong>of</strong> circumstances <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case. No<br />

articles were provided to prove safety or clinical benefit. No specialist report<br />

was provided to <strong>the</strong> Community <strong>Exceptional</strong> Circumstances Panel on <strong>the</strong> case.<br />

Only a note to <strong>the</strong> patient’s GP relating to a recent out-patient’s consultation<br />

was provided. No mention was made <strong>of</strong> any difficulty managing <strong>the</strong> patient or<br />

unusual circumstances which were prevailing. No mention was made in <strong>the</strong><br />

note <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> need to apply to PHARMAC for a Community <strong>Exceptional</strong><br />

Circumstances subsidy. The only mention was <strong>the</strong> following comment to <strong>the</strong><br />

GP: “Mum says she <strong>does</strong> have some problems giving him <strong>the</strong> indomethacin and<br />

<strong>the</strong>re also has been a problem with supply more recently” (<strong>Exceptional</strong><br />

Circumstances Panel 2010).<br />

This comment indicated that <strong>the</strong> patient had already been prescribed <strong>the</strong> drug<br />

and <strong>the</strong> information supplied in <strong>the</strong> application suggested that this process was<br />

constructed to approve a subsidy for <strong>the</strong> medicine despite <strong>the</strong> application<br />

criteria and requirements not being met.<br />

The application was successful and <strong>the</strong> patient was notified through GP. The<br />

Panel did not give any reasons in <strong>the</strong> letter as to why <strong>the</strong> application was<br />

approved.<br />

Case No. 5 (OIA Document No. 86) July 2010.<br />

This was a case <strong>of</strong> a GP making a claim to <strong>the</strong> Community <strong>Exceptional</strong><br />

Circumstances Panel on behalf <strong>of</strong> a woman who was suffering interstitial lung<br />

disease with a pneumonitis believed to be induced by taking <strong>the</strong> drug<br />

Lefluromide. The 3 month initial application was made for a drug named n-<br />

acetyl cystine at a cost <strong>of</strong> $412.00 for 100 tablets. The application noted that<br />

this drug could be sourced through a company named Life Extension Pacific Ltd<br />

for US$ 21.50 for 60 tablets.<br />

The application was made under <strong>the</strong> criterion <strong>of</strong> unusual combination <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />

circumstances. These circumstances were that <strong>the</strong> patient had developed rare<br />

side effects <strong>of</strong> pneumonitis as a result <strong>of</strong> taking Lefluromide and Methotrexate<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r whilst trying to manage her rheumatoid arthritis.<br />

206

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!