30.06.2013 Views

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

organisation named <strong>the</strong> Researched Medicines Industry Association (RMI) 26 .<br />

The RMI argued that <strong>the</strong> only rationale for an exemption to <strong>the</strong> Commerce Act<br />

was to allow PHARMAC <strong>the</strong> opportunity to establish a national purchasing<br />

policy (PB/18 The Researched Medicines Industry Association <strong>of</strong> New Zealand,<br />

2000). This situation was not dissimilar to <strong>the</strong> limited exemption which was<br />

granted to <strong>the</strong> four RHAs prior to <strong>the</strong> Bill to allow <strong>the</strong>m to manage and operate<br />

<strong>the</strong> pharmaceutical schedule <strong>of</strong> medicines which were subsidised by <strong>the</strong><br />

government. According to <strong>the</strong> RMI, <strong>the</strong> arrangement worked perfectly well<br />

without a total exemption and made medicines available at a cheap price or at<br />

no cost to <strong>the</strong> patients.<br />

The RMI 27 placed emphasis on <strong>the</strong> words ‘limited exemption’ and strongly<br />

objected to <strong>the</strong> provisions in <strong>the</strong> Bill that granted PHARMAC considerably more<br />

price fixing powers than existed under <strong>the</strong> previous RHA structure.<br />

Essentially <strong>the</strong> difference in <strong>the</strong> proposed legislation was that PHARMAC was<br />

to be given an exemption to incorporate agreements between purchasing<br />

agents and individual pharmaceutical companies ra<strong>the</strong>r than limiting <strong>the</strong><br />

immunity to agreements between <strong>the</strong> DHBs, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health and PHARMAC<br />

(PB/18 The Researched Medicines Industry Association <strong>of</strong> New Zealand, 2000).<br />

It was suggested that this would allow PHARMAC and <strong>the</strong> DHBs to enter into<br />

price control arrangements which would distort market forces by virtue <strong>of</strong><br />

monopsonistic behaviour 28 .<br />

The RMI argued that <strong>the</strong> effect would be to limit competition and <strong>the</strong> ability for<br />

<strong>the</strong> market to differentiate on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> health care products. They<br />

submitted that PHARMAC’s control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> market would also lead to<br />

inconsistent prices in New Zealand which would be out <strong>of</strong> step with world<br />

prices. This would damage New Zealand’s relationship with international<br />

pharmaceutical companies and act as a disincentive for research and<br />

investment in pharmaceutical developments in New Zealand. There also<br />

existed a potential to antagonise international pharmaceutical companies<br />

26 In September 2011 <strong>the</strong> Researched Medicines Industry Association (RMI) changed its name to Medicines New<br />

Zealand (MNZ). The new organisation joined toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> RMI current members and several o<strong>the</strong>r stakeholders from<br />

New Zealand’s health sector.MNZ website is found at http://www.medicinesnz.co.nz/<br />

27 In particular ss27-30 (PB/18 The Researched Medicines Industry Association <strong>of</strong> New Zealand, 2000)<br />

28 Monopsonistic behavior is where a sole purchaser exerts control over <strong>the</strong> price and supply to a market for goods or<br />

services (Mankew, 2001). The opposite <strong>of</strong> monopsonistic behavior is monopolistic behaviour where <strong>the</strong> sole seller<br />

exerts influence on <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> goods and services.<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!