30.06.2013 Views

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

impenetrable and decisions were dominated by PHARMAC’s view <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

value.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Community <strong>Exceptional</strong> Circumstances policy, PHARMAC did not<br />

demonstrate that decisions were made primarily in consideration <strong>of</strong> a person’s<br />

capacity to live a life <strong>the</strong>y might value, but ra<strong>the</strong>r to ensure its own budget levels<br />

were not breached. Making <strong>the</strong>se allocative decisions is consistent with<br />

PHARMAC’s statutory purpose and, given this set <strong>of</strong> circumstances, <strong>the</strong> gained<br />

reputation is understandable.<br />

Equally, PHARMAC has gained a national and international reputation <strong>of</strong><br />

excellence in public health rationing practice and is well regarded among New<br />

Zealand senior government health <strong>of</strong>ficials. PHARMAC’s practices are now<br />

being promoted as appropriate methods for analytically prioritising (rationing)<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r health service spending and procurement. Whilst <strong>the</strong>re may be challenges<br />

to <strong>the</strong> fairness and equity considerations <strong>of</strong> implementing this idea, this research<br />

has shown that PHARMAC is <strong>the</strong> clear leader among OECD countries for<br />

procurement in terms <strong>of</strong> value for money.<br />

The research has also shown how PHARMAC has achieved budget control in<br />

operating <strong>the</strong> Community <strong>Exceptional</strong> Circumstances policy by managing <strong>the</strong><br />

budget and when required, giving greater weighting to <strong>the</strong> affordability decision<br />

making criteria above <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r criteria it promulgates. The research has<br />

demonstrated that some allocative committees, for example <strong>the</strong> Community<br />

<strong>Exceptional</strong> Circumstances Panel, did not record <strong>the</strong>ir reasons for making <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

decisions. Again this is understandable from <strong>the</strong>ir point <strong>of</strong> view, however not<br />

advising claimants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reason for decisions is inherently unfair and provides no<br />

level <strong>of</strong> procedural justice to claimants who are declined <strong>the</strong>ir claims.<br />

The research also discovered that <strong>the</strong>re is no clear set <strong>of</strong> values which have<br />

been promulgated by PHARMAC to indicate which values guide PHARMAC’s<br />

decision making, o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> desire to achieve budget (which is not a value<br />

but an outcome). PHARMAC achieves this outcome by generally following <strong>the</strong><br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!