30.06.2013 Views

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

They claim that health inequities count and that <strong>the</strong>y are avoidable,<br />

unnecessary and unfair. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> Marmot Review published in England in<br />

2010 (Strategic Review <strong>of</strong> Health Inequalities in England Post - 2010)<br />

demonstrated <strong>the</strong> link between social opportunities, equality, fairness and life<br />

expectancy. This position emphasises <strong>the</strong> connection between <strong>the</strong> social<br />

conditions and predictable biological pathways (Marmot, 2010).<br />

New Zealand has been criticised for <strong>the</strong> high levels <strong>of</strong> income inequity by<br />

Wilkinson and Pickett (2007) in <strong>the</strong>ir book The Spirit Level. They have shown<br />

that at <strong>the</strong> macro-level, unequal levels in income distribution within countries (or<br />

within cities) are linked to social pathologies. They have draw a correlation<br />

between income inequity and relative rates <strong>of</strong> morbidity and mortality, obesity,<br />

teenage birth rates, mental illness, homicide, low trust, low social capital,<br />

hostility, and racism (Wilkinson & Pickett, 2007). The <strong>the</strong>ory presented linked<br />

individual health status to deep-seated social problems associated with poverty,<br />

poor formal education, relative deprivation and low social status. They also<br />

made <strong>the</strong> claim that income inequality is related to communities lacking in<br />

cohesion, social relationships and bedevilled by mistrust. In <strong>the</strong>se<br />

circumstances <strong>of</strong> high levels <strong>of</strong> social inequality, increasing access to health<br />

care will make no difference to poor health outcomes because <strong>the</strong>ir research<br />

has concluded <strong>the</strong> aetiologies <strong>of</strong> ill health lie in <strong>the</strong> perpetuating inequalities.<br />

Wilkinson and Picket (2007) also wrote an article on health inequities titled The<br />

problems <strong>of</strong> relative deprivation: Why some societies do better than o<strong>the</strong>rs. In<br />

this article, <strong>the</strong>y reported on a review <strong>of</strong> 186 studies where a correlation existed<br />

between income inequality and population health. The review showed that<br />

more egalitarian societies were healthier. They have identified New Zealand,<br />

along with <strong>the</strong> USA, as countries with very wide levels <strong>of</strong> income disparity and<br />

increasing social inequity.<br />

There has been considerable debate about <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> Wilkinson and<br />

Pickett’s work on social inequity. Snowden challenged The Spirit Level in his<br />

book The Spirit Level Delusion: Fact-checking <strong>the</strong> Left's new <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong><br />

everything, contending that <strong>the</strong> inequality model proposed is selective because<br />

it excludes some richer countries which are more socially equitable and<br />

includes a greater number <strong>of</strong> less equitable countries. He argues that this has<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!