30.06.2013 Views

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5: Research Method<br />

Introduction<br />

This chapter describes <strong>the</strong> research <strong>the</strong>ory and method utilised to ga<strong>the</strong>r and<br />

analyse <strong>the</strong> research data about PHARMAC’s Community <strong>Exceptional</strong><br />

Circumstances policy.<br />

In this chapter <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory behind public policy research is discussed. This<br />

research project was approved by <strong>the</strong> Auckland University <strong>of</strong> Technology Ethics<br />

Committee (AUTEC) and <strong>the</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> this approval are outlined.<br />

The methods <strong>of</strong> collecting <strong>the</strong> research data from five sources (interviews,<br />

media study, leglislation, a court case and <strong>of</strong>ficial information) are discussed.<br />

This is followed by a discussion about <strong>the</strong> Braun and Clark’s (2006) <strong>the</strong>matic<br />

analysis and what is involved in a successful implementation <strong>of</strong> this method.<br />

Finally, <strong>the</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>matic analysis describing Braun and Clark’s six<br />

phases sets out how <strong>the</strong> research data were handled and analysed.<br />

The Theory <strong>of</strong> Researching Public Policy<br />

Authors have described <strong>the</strong> difficulty <strong>of</strong> managing public policy research<br />

(Bardach, 2000; Coleman, 1975). As has been stated previously, <strong>the</strong> starting<br />

point for analysing public policy is an examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social and <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />

traditions which are built up over time and which have come to be accepted<br />

(Cheyne, et al., 2005). Public policy aims to utilise <strong>the</strong>se underlying<br />

assumptions to establish guidelines and interventions (Baehler, 2000, 2003)<br />

and also looks at <strong>the</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> drawing on <strong>the</strong>se assumptions to<br />

validate knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject (Cheyne, et al., 2005).<br />

There are differences between analysing social assumptions through qualitative<br />

design and analysing <strong>the</strong> policy outcomes using scientific quantitative design.<br />

Cheyne et al. (2005) argue that this is because policy research operates at <strong>the</strong><br />

boundary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two research worlds. Such thinking supports Coleman’s<br />

earlier work in 1975 which contended that <strong>the</strong>re is no single comprehensive<br />

method for analysis <strong>of</strong> policy questions (Coleman, 1975).<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!