30.06.2013 Views

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Applying <strong>the</strong> Test-Questions .................................................................................. 75<br />

The Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Test-Questions in This Thesis ........................................................ 81<br />

Chapter 5: Research Method ................................................................................... 82<br />

Introduction 82<br />

The Theory <strong>of</strong> Researching Public Policy ............................................................... 82<br />

Ethical Approval ..................................................................................................... 86<br />

Ga<strong>the</strong>ring <strong>the</strong> Data ................................................................................................. 88<br />

The New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000..................................................... 88<br />

Walsh vs PHARMAC ........................................................................................................... 89<br />

Media Study ......................................................................................................................... 89<br />

Key Informant Interviews ..................................................................................................... 91<br />

Requests under <strong>the</strong> Official information Act 1982 ............................................................... 96<br />

Thematic Analysis .................................................................................................. 98<br />

Phase One ........................................................................................................................... 99<br />

Phase Two ........................................................................................................................... 99<br />

Phase Three ....................................................................................................................... 104<br />

Phase Four ......................................................................................................................... 104<br />

Phase Five ......................................................................................................................... 106<br />

Phase Six ........................................................................................................................... 106<br />

Chapter 6: Research Findings ............................................................................... 107<br />

Introduction 107<br />

Section 1: The New Zealand Health and Disability Act 2000 ................................ 108<br />

General Provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Health Act ......................................................................... 108<br />

Recognition <strong>of</strong> The Treaty <strong>of</strong> Waitangi .............................................................................. 110<br />

The Establishment <strong>of</strong> PHARMAC as a Crown Agency ...................................................... 111<br />

PHARMAC Required to Manage <strong>Exceptional</strong> Circumstances Schemes........................... 112<br />

Submissions to <strong>the</strong> Health Select Committee .................................................................... 112<br />

PHARMAC’s Exemption from <strong>the</strong> Commerce Act 1986 .................................................... 113<br />

PHARMAC’s Immunity from Prosecution .......................................................................... 117<br />

Submissions <strong>of</strong> PHARMAC’s Functions ............................................................................ 120<br />

Submissions on <strong>the</strong> Inclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treaty <strong>of</strong> Waitangi in <strong>the</strong> Bill ......... 121<br />

Submission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rationing <strong>of</strong> Medicines ......................................................................... 125<br />

Request by The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health ..................................................................................... 126<br />

Submission on <strong>the</strong> PHARMAC’s Decision Making ............................................................ 126<br />

Submission on Complementary Medicines ........................................................................ 127<br />

The Select Committee Report-Back on <strong>the</strong> Submissions .................................................. 128<br />

Section 2: Walsh v. PHARMAC ............................................................................ 128<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Case ...................................................................................................... 129<br />

The Case for <strong>the</strong> Plaintiffs .................................................................................................. 129<br />

The Nature <strong>of</strong> Judicial Review in New Zealand ................................................................. 131<br />

The Relevant Functions <strong>of</strong> PHARMAC .............................................................................. 132<br />

PHARMAC’s Herceptin Decision Making .......................................................................... 133<br />

The Clinical Evidence Supporting Herceptin ..................................................................... 134<br />

The Use <strong>of</strong> Cost-utility Analysis ......................................................................................... 135<br />

The ‘nine week’ or ‘twelve months’ Debate ....................................................................... 136<br />

Walsh’s Evidence ............................................................................................................... 138<br />

The Decision – PHARMAC Acted Lawfully ........................................................................ 139<br />

The Decision – All Grounds for Appeal Fail ....................................................................... 140<br />

Decision – PHARMAC Did Not Consult Adequately .......................................................... 140<br />

Clarification <strong>of</strong> Rogers v. Swindon NHS Primary Care Trust ............................................. 141<br />

Decision on Medsafe’s Non-Approval <strong>of</strong> Herceptin for a nine week Regime .................... 141<br />

Judge Comments on PHARMAC’s Consultation Processes ............................................. 142<br />

Judge’s Concluding Remarks ............................................................................................ 143<br />

Political Decision re Herceptin ........................................................................................... 143<br />

iii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!