30.06.2013 Views

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

How does the operation of PHARMAC's 'Community Exceptional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

No we have never thought that $3 million is not enough…I mean we<br />

have managed pretty well on that. (Interviewee B)<br />

‘B’ described <strong>the</strong> problem for PHARMAC where <strong>the</strong>y provide a Community<br />

<strong>Exceptional</strong> Circumstances claim for a subsidy for a particular condition which<br />

met <strong>the</strong> funding criteria and <strong>the</strong>n doctors began to diagnose this problem more<br />

regularly. Then <strong>the</strong> medical condition actually became more common and was<br />

no longer rare. This substantiated a claim that <strong>the</strong> drug should be placed on <strong>the</strong><br />

general pharmaceutical schedules. This indicated that Community <strong>Exceptional</strong><br />

Circumstances claims were a route for getting a drug noticed and <strong>the</strong>n funded<br />

on one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pharmaceutical schedules.<br />

With something that is actually stunningly rare…<strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

becomes more common. I don’t mean doctors are playing games or<br />

anything like that but…when something rare is diagnosed and we<br />

fund it under EC [Community <strong>Exceptional</strong> Circumstances]…it<br />

becomes something that people become aware <strong>of</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rare condition just turn up. There are some good<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> this: Pulmonary coronary hypertension is a good<br />

example…where doctors are finding that <strong>the</strong>y are able to diagnose it<br />

much more readily and <strong>the</strong>n it no longer becomes a rare condition,<br />

so yes it <strong>does</strong> go onto <strong>the</strong> schedule…eventually. (Interviewee B)<br />

Interviewee ‘C’: “I am not equipped to worry too much about <strong>the</strong> fairness to this<br />

one or <strong>the</strong> fairness to that one”.<br />

The format for reporting this interview is slightly different to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r interviews<br />

presented. This is because <strong>the</strong> questions which were put to interviewee ‘C’<br />

were particularly insightful in informing <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> answers. The<br />

questions in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r interviews were conversation starters. I felt that both <strong>the</strong><br />

questions and flow <strong>of</strong> conversation which Interviewee “C” were necessary to<br />

report.<br />

These questions are identified as Q in <strong>the</strong> text and <strong>the</strong> answers are identified as<br />

A in <strong>the</strong> following text. This system is used in subsequent interviewers as well.<br />

Interviewee ‘C’ was had a long experience <strong>of</strong> deciding on Community<br />

<strong>Exceptional</strong> Circumstances claims. ‘C’ confirmed this in <strong>the</strong> interview.<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!