21.07.2013 Views

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

justice system for any court appearances or other matters<br />

concerning the charges. Therefore, the Rules Committee has<br />

retained the concept of personal recognizance in section (a).<br />

In section (b), Defendants Eligible for Release by<br />

Commissioner or Judge, references to Code, Criminal Procedure<br />

Article, §§ 5-101, 5-201, <strong>and</strong> 5-202 have been added, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

section has been restyled to make clear that the judicial officer<br />

may impose conditions not only on a defendant who is released on<br />

bail but also on a defendant who is released on personal<br />

recognizance pursuant to this section of the Rule. The cross<br />

reference following section (b) is deleted as unnecessary, in<br />

light of the inclusion of the Code references in the text of<br />

section (b).<br />

Identical language concerning conditions of release that<br />

“will reasonably ensure (1) the appearance of the defendant as<br />

required <strong>and</strong> (2) the safety of the alleged victim, another<br />

person, <strong>and</strong> the community” has been included in sections (b) <strong>and</strong><br />

(c). Where references to one or both components of this st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

are made in other sections of the Rule, the language is conformed<br />

to that of sections (b) <strong>and</strong> (c).<br />

Subsection (1) of section (d), Duties of Judicial Officer,<br />

sets forth a list of factors for the judicial officer to take<br />

into account in determining whether a defendant should be<br />

released <strong>and</strong> the conditions of any release. In the introductory<br />

clause, the word “shall” replaces the word “may,” requiring the<br />

judicial officer to take into account certain information “to the<br />

extent available.” Subsection (d)(1)(F) is amended to include<br />

any information presented by the defendant, as well as by the<br />

defendant’s counsel. A new sentence is added to subsection<br />

(d)(4) requiring the judicial officer to state on the record or<br />

in writing the amount <strong>and</strong> terms of any bail.<br />

The Rules Committee is presenting several alternatives for<br />

the wording of the bail bond provision in subsection (e)(4). One<br />

alternative, which is the recommendation of the Rules Committee,<br />

includes language stating that if the judicial officer sets bail<br />

at $2500 or less, the judicial officer shall advise the defendant<br />

that he or she may post a bail bond secured either by a corporate<br />

surety or by a cash deposit of 10% of the full penalty amount.<br />

Another alternative is that the judicial officer must explain in<br />

writing when the judicial officer sets a greater amount of bail<br />

than 10% of the full penalty amount. Both of these alternatives<br />

are in response to complaints by defense attorneys <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Pretrial Release Project Advisory Committee that commissioners do<br />

not choose the 10% option. The alternatives exp<strong>and</strong> on the types<br />

of bail allowed because of an overlap between subsections<br />

(e)(4)(B) <strong>and</strong> (e)(4)(C). Both versions include an increase from<br />

$25.00 to $100.00 in the minimum amount of collateral security<br />

-132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!