21.07.2013 Views

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

production to the court upon the request of the court or any<br />

party.<br />

Cross reference: See Rule 1-301 (d), requiring that court papers<br />

be legible <strong>and</strong> of permanent quality.<br />

Source: This Rule is derived in part from F.R.C.P. 5 (e) the 1980<br />

version of Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 (e) <strong>and</strong> Rule 102 1 d of the Rules of<br />

the United States District Court for the District of Maryl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

is in part new.<br />

REPORTER’S NOTE<br />

The proposed amendment to Rule 1-322 is prompted by the<br />

holding in Beyer v. Morgan State, 369 Md. 335 (2002) that allows a<br />

motion for summary judgment to be filed orally. The amendment<br />

makes clear that when a rule, such as Rule 2-501 (a), requires<br />

that a pleading or paper be “filed,” the pleading or paper must be<br />

in writing <strong>and</strong> delivered to the clerk of the court or a judge of<br />

that court.<br />

-397

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!