C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

written report made by the expert concerning those findings and
opinions; (B) a party may obtain further discovery, by deposition
or otherwise, of the findings and opinions to which an expert is
expected to testify at trial, including any written reports made
by the expert concerning those findings and opinions. A party
also may take the deposition of the expert.
Committee note: This subsection requires a party to disclose the
name and address of any witness who may give an expert opinion at
trial, whether or not that person was retained in anticipation of
litigation or for trial. Cf. Dorsey v. Nold, 362 Md. 241 (2001).
See Rule 104.10 of the Rules of the U.S. District Court for the
District of Maryland. The subsection does not require, however,
that a party name himself or herself as an expert. See Turgut v.
Levin, 79 Md. App. 279 (1989).
(B) Additional Disclosure With Respect to Experts Retained
in Anticipation of Litigation or for Trial
In addition to the discovery permitted under
subsection (f)(1)(A) of this Rule, a party by interrogatories may
require the other party to summarize the qualifications of a
person expected to be called as an expert witness at trial and
whose findings and opinions were acquired or obtained in
anticipation of litigation or for trial, to produce any available
list of publications written by that expert, and to state the
terms of the expert’s compensation.
(2) Not Expected to Be Called at Trial
When an expert has been retained by a party in
anticipation of litigation or preparation for trial but is not
expected to be called as a witness at trial, discovery of the
identity, findings, and opinions of the expert may be obtained
-47