21.07.2013 Views

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Rule 2-402 (f)(3) is proposed to be amended with respect to<br />

the allocation of expert fees <strong>and</strong> expenses. The fee <strong>and</strong> expense<br />

provisions set forth in the amendment are applicable "unless the<br />

court orders otherwise on the ground of manifest injustice."<br />

Instead of the vague allowance of a fee for time spent "in<br />

responding to discovery," subsection (f)(3)(A) authorizes a fee<br />

only for time spent in attending the deposition <strong>and</strong> in traveling<br />

to <strong>and</strong> from the deposition, plus travel expenses. Subsection<br />

(f)(3)(A) further limits the rate that a party seeking discovery<br />

must pay to an expert for attending a deposition to the rate<br />

charged by the expert for time spent preparing for the<br />

deposition. This is similar to the policy reflected in Local<br />

Rule 104.11.a. of the Rules of the United States District Court<br />

for the District of Maryl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Additionally, with respect to the rare occurrence of<br />

discovery that is allowed under subsection (f)(2), subsection<br />

(f)(3)(B) requires the party seeking discovery to pay the expert<br />

a reasonable fee for preparing for the deposition.<br />

-50-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!