21.07.2013 Views

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

C:\Documents and Settings\thomast\Local Settings\Temp\c.lotus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Source: This Rule is derived as follows:<br />

Section (a) is derived from former Rule R71 a.<br />

Section (b) is derived from former Rule R72 a <strong>and</strong> b.<br />

Section (c) is in part derived from former Rule R73 a <strong>and</strong> is in<br />

part new.<br />

Section (d) is new.<br />

REPORTER’S NOTE<br />

Former Rule R73 b 2 allowed the Department of Veterans<br />

Affairs to substitute its own internal procedures in place of the<br />

requirement that two physicians must certify that the person who<br />

is the subject of the guardianship petition is disabled. At<br />

first this provision was not carried forward when the Fiduciary<br />

Rules were revised, but in 1998, Rule 10-202 (a)(2) was changed<br />

so that when a guardianship of the person of a Department of<br />

Veterans Affairs beneficiary is filed, a certificate of the<br />

Veterans Affairs Administrator may substitute for physician’s<br />

certificates setting forth the fact that the person has been<br />

rated disabled. A request has been made on behalf of the<br />

Department of Veterans Affairs to extend the Veterans<br />

Administrator beneficiary exception to guardianships of the<br />

property of an alleged disabled person. This would entail a<br />

change to Rule 10-301 (d), so that it is consistent with<br />

subsection (a)(2) of Rule 10-202. The lawyer requesting this<br />

change had intended for it to be made at the time Rule 10-202<br />

(a)(2) was modified. The Committee recommends that Rule 10-301<br />

(d) be so changed.<br />

-265-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!