21.07.2013 Views

CCSAP Report - Ministry of Home Affairs

CCSAP Report - Ministry of Home Affairs

CCSAP Report - Ministry of Home Affairs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.16.02 The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court<br />

challenging the Act, the Rules and the proposed action <strong>of</strong> the state Government<br />

as ultra vires <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. The Supreme Court, after analysing the relevant<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> the Constitution and the Act, granted injunction on the Andhra<br />

Government order <strong>of</strong> relieving non-domicile employees employed in the<br />

Telangana region by February 28, 1969, and further declared that Section 3 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957, in so far as it<br />

related to Telangana and Rule 3 <strong>of</strong> the Rules under it were ultra vires <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution. The Supreme Court based its judgment on the argument that the<br />

Parliament, in exercise <strong>of</strong> its powers under Article(s) 35(a) and 16(3) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution, could make laws with regard to residential qualifications for the<br />

whole “state” but not for “parts” <strong>of</strong> the state.<br />

5.16.03 The Supreme Court order, dated 28.03.1969, brought to a<br />

premature end to Section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Public Employment (Requirement as to<br />

Residence) Act, 1957, in so far as it related to Telangana, and Rule 3 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Rules, which would have otherwise continued till March, 1974. It is pertinent to<br />

note that at this point in time, there existed no constitutional/legal safeguards for<br />

the residents <strong>of</strong> the Telangana region in the matter <strong>of</strong> reservation in public<br />

employment. Section 2 <strong>of</strong> the Act had automatically repealed the Mulki Rules in<br />

March, 1959, when the Act had come into operation. Now, the requirement as to<br />

residence, put in place by Section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Act and Rule 3 <strong>of</strong> the Rules, had also<br />

been extinguished by the judgment <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Court.<br />

5.17 Revival <strong>of</strong> Mulki Rules<br />

5.17.01 The Supreme Court order, dated 28.03.1969, which declared<br />

Section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957,<br />

and Rule 3 <strong>of</strong> the Rules as ultra-vires, extinguished the 15 years requirement as<br />

to residence. The Mulki Rules already stood repealed as a result <strong>of</strong> the operation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Section 2 <strong>of</strong> the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957,<br />

since March 1959. So, did it mean that no safeguard (<strong>of</strong> residential qualification)<br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!