CCSAP Report - Ministry of Home Affairs

egional GDPs as percentages of state GDP has remained relatively stable
between 1999-2000 and 2005-06, suggesting that the measured GDP growth in
the state is proportionately distributed. 7 The contribution from coastal Andhra
and Telangana are somewhat similar and about a sixth of Telangana‟s GDP
comes from Hyderabad. Table 6.2 presents the structure of regional GDP‟s
(sector shares for 2005-06).
Table 6.2 Structure of Regional GDPs: Sector Shares for 2005-06
Coastal
Andhra
Agr. Mining Regd.
Mfg.
Unregd.
Mfg.
308
Constr. Trpt.
Tradl.
Svcs.*
Modern
Svcs.†
Public
Svcs.
30% 1% 8% 4% 7% 6% 22% 15% 6%
Rayalaseema 30% 3% 2% 6% 9% 5% 23% 16% 7%
Telangana
excluding
Hyderabad
24% 6% 11% 3% 8% 4% 25% 13% 6%
Hyderabad 1% 0% 6% 1% 8% 19% 16% 39% 10%
Source: Calculated from data provided by Planning Commission
(http://planningcommission.gov.in/plans/stateplan/index.php?state=ssphdbody.htm). Totals may not add to 100 due to
rounding. The shares are at constant 1999-2000 prices, while the per capita incomes are for 2005-06 at current prices,
based on population in the Statistical Abstract, Andhra Pradesh 2009 *Trade Hotels and Restaurants. † Communication,
Banking and Insurance Real Estate, Business Services and Legal Services
6.8 Structure of GDP
6.8.01 This distinct character of Hyderabad economy is more evident from
the structure of the district GDP. A disaggregated analysis of contributions of
different sectors in the four regions reveals that Hyderabad‟s structure differs
radically from the other regions. Modern services form 39% of the economic
activity in Hyderabad, with transport accounting for another 19%.
7 In calculating district GDPs, the Planning Commission appears to have apportioned some sectors, e.g. unregistered
manufacturing and construction proportionately across the state, i.e., their rates of growth are the same by assumption.