22.07.2013 Views

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRINCIPLES OF FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY 133<br />

the numerator does not matter. The autocorrelation plots<br />

have half as many datapoints as the original data set.<br />

One example <strong>of</strong> an autocorrelation plot was seen in<br />

Figure 4.27, where data for NATA were presented for measurements<br />

versus scattered light and versus a lifetime reference.<br />

This instrument showed a minor color effect, which<br />

resulted in some systematic deviations between N c (t k ) and<br />

N(t k ). The systematic differences are barely visible in the<br />

direct plot <strong>of</strong> the deviations (middle left). The autocorrelation<br />

plot (upper left) allowed the deviations to be visualized<br />

as positive and negative correlations in adjacent or distant<br />

channels, respectively. For closely spaced channels the<br />

deviations are likely to both be the same sign. For more distant<br />

channels the deviations are likely to be <strong>of</strong> opposite<br />

signs. These systematic errors were eliminated by the use <strong>of</strong><br />

a lifetime reference, as seen by the flat autocorrelation plot<br />

(upper right panel).<br />

4.10. ANALYSIS OF MULTI-EXPONENTIAL<br />

DECAYS<br />

4.10.1. p-Terphenyl and Indole:Two Widely<br />

Spaced Lifetimes<br />

An understanding <strong>of</strong> time-domain data analysis is facilitated<br />

by examination <strong>of</strong> representative data. As an example we<br />

chose a mixture <strong>of</strong> p-terphenyl and indole, which individually<br />

display single exponential decays <strong>of</strong> 0.93 and 3.58 ns,<br />

respectively. For the time-domain measurements a mixture<br />

<strong>of</strong> p-terphenyl and indole was observed at 330 nm, where<br />

both species emit (Figure 4.46). TCSPC data for this mix-<br />

Figure 4.46. Emission spectra <strong>of</strong> p-terphenyl (p-T), indole (In) and <strong>of</strong><br />

the mixture. Excitation was at 292 nm, from a frequency-doubled<br />

R6G dye laser. The emission at 330 nm was isolated with a monochromator.<br />

From [187].<br />

Figure 4.47. Time-domain intensity decay <strong>of</strong> a two-component mixture<br />

<strong>of</strong> indole and p-terphenyl. The dashed line shows the one-decaytime<br />

fit, and the solid line the two-decay-time fit. From [187].<br />

ture are shown in Figure 4.47. The presence <strong>of</strong> two decay<br />

times is evident from curvature in the plot <strong>of</strong> log N(t) versus<br />

time. The time-dependent data could not be fit to a single<br />

decay time, as seen by the mismatch <strong>of</strong> the calculated<br />

convolution integral (dashed) with the data (dots).<br />

The lower panels show the deviations (D k ) or differences<br />

between the measured and calculated data:<br />

D k I(t k) I c(t k)<br />

√I(t k)<br />

(4.24)<br />

The weighted residual (W.Res.) or deviations plots are used<br />

because it is easier to see the differences between I(t k ) and<br />

I c (t k ) in these plots than in a plot <strong>of</strong> log I(t k ) versus t k . Also,<br />

the residuals are weighted according to the standard deviation<br />

<strong>of</strong> each datapoint. For a good fit these values are<br />

expected to randomly distribute around zero, with a mean<br />

value near unity.<br />

4.10.2. Comparison <strong>of</strong> χ R 2 Values: F Statistic<br />

How can one compare the values <strong>of</strong> χ R 2 for two fits? This<br />

can be done using the F statistic, which is a ratio <strong>of</strong> χ R 2 val-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!