22.07.2013 Views

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5<br />

In the preceding chapter we described the theory and instrumentation<br />

for measuring fluorescence intensity decays<br />

using time-domain measurements. In the present chapter<br />

we continue this discussion, but describe frequency-domain<br />

fluorometry. In this method the sample is excited with light<br />

that is intensity modulated at a high frequency comparable<br />

to the reciprocal <strong>of</strong> the lifetime. When this is done, the<br />

emission is intensity modulated at the same frequency.<br />

However, the emission does not precisely follow the excitation,<br />

but rather shows time delays and amplitude changes<br />

that are determined by the intensity decay law <strong>of</strong> the sample.<br />

The time delay is measured as a phase angle shift<br />

between the excitation and emission, as was shown in Figure<br />

4.2. The peak-to-peak height <strong>of</strong> the modulated emission<br />

is decreased relative to the modulated excitation, and provides<br />

another independent measure <strong>of</strong> the lifetime.<br />

Time-resolved measurements, whether performed in<br />

the time domain or in the frequency domain, provides information<br />

about intensity decay <strong>of</strong> the sample. Samples with<br />

multiple fluorophores typically display multi-exponential<br />

decays. Even samples with a single fluorophore can display<br />

complex intensity decays due to conformational heterogeneity,<br />

resonance energy transfer, and transient effects in<br />

diffusive quenching or fluorophore–solvent interactions, to<br />

name just the most common origins. The goal <strong>of</strong> the timeresolved<br />

measurement is to determine the form <strong>of</strong> the intensity<br />

decay law, and to interpret the decay in terms <strong>of</strong> molecular<br />

features <strong>of</strong> the sample.<br />

Intensity decays can be single-exponential, multi-exponential,<br />

or non-exponential. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> the complexity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the decay, one can always define a mean or apparent<br />

decay time. For a single exponential decay in the time<br />

domain the actual lifetime is given by this the time when the<br />

intensity decays to 1/e <strong>of</strong> its initial value. For a multi-exponential<br />

decay, the 1/e time is typically not equal to any <strong>of</strong><br />

the decay times. In the frequency domain an apparent lifetime<br />

(τ φ ) determined from the phase angle (φ ω ) or the appar-<br />

Frequency-Domain<br />

Lifetime<br />

Measurements<br />

ent lifetime (τ m ) determined from the modulation (m ω , eqs.<br />

4.5 and 4.6). The apparent lifetimes are characteristic <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sample, but do not provide a complete description <strong>of</strong> the<br />

complex intensity decay. The values <strong>of</strong> τ φ and τ m need not<br />

be equal, and each value represents a different weighted<br />

average <strong>of</strong> the decay times displayed by the sample. In general,<br />

the apparent lifetime depends on the method <strong>of</strong> measurement.<br />

The earlier literature on time-resolved fluorescence<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten describes apparent lifetimes. At present, there<br />

are relatively few reports <strong>of</strong> only the mean decay times.<br />

This is because the mean lifetimes represent complex<br />

weighted averages <strong>of</strong> the multi-exponential decay. Quantitative<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> mean decay times is usually difficult<br />

and the results are <strong>of</strong>ten ambiguous.<br />

Prior to 1983, frequency-domain fluorometry allowed<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> mean lifetime, but was not able to resolve<br />

complex intensity decays. This limitation was the result <strong>of</strong><br />

phase-modulation fluorometers, which only operated at<br />

one, two, or three fixed light modulation frequencies. The<br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> a complex decay requires measurements at a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> modulation frequencies that span the frequency<br />

response <strong>of</strong> the sample. While several variable-frequency<br />

instruments were described prior to 1983, these were not<br />

generally useful and were limited by systematic errors. The<br />

first generally useful variable frequency instrument was<br />

described in the mid 1980s. 1–2 These instruments allowed<br />

phase and modulation measurements from 1 to 200 MHz.<br />

These designs are the basis <strong>of</strong> currently available instruments.<br />

Frequency-domain fluorometry is now in widespread<br />

use, 3–9 and instruments are commercially available.<br />

Frequency-domain fluorometers are now routinely used to<br />

study multi-exponential intensity decays, and non-exponential<br />

decays resulting from resonance energy transfer, timedependent<br />

solvent relaxation, and collisional quenching.<br />

In this chapter we describe the instrumentation for FD<br />

measurements and the theory used to interpret the experimental<br />

data. We will describe examples that illustrate the<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!