22.07.2013 Views

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRINCIPLES OF FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY 285<br />

Figure 8.6. Acrylamide quenching <strong>of</strong> NATA in water (!). The open<br />

circles show the values <strong>of</strong> F 0 /(F e V[Q] ) where V = 2.0 M –1 . Revised<br />

from [20].<br />

Figure 8.7. Acrylamide quenching <strong>of</strong> dihydroequilenin (DHE) in<br />

buffer containing 10% sucrose at 11°C. The value <strong>of</strong> V was 2.4 M –1 .<br />

Revised and reprinted with permission from [21]. Copyright © 1990,<br />

American Chemical Society.<br />

8.7). The upward-curving Stern-Volmer plots could be analyzed<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> the static and dynamic quenching constants<br />

(eq. 8.19). This analysis yields K S values near 2.8 and<br />

5.2 M –1 for acrylamide quenching <strong>of</strong> NATA and DHE,<br />

respectively. These values imply that quencher concentrations<br />

near 0.3 M are required to quench half <strong>of</strong> the fluorophores<br />

by a static process. Such a weak association suggests<br />

that the fluorophores and quenchers do not actually<br />

form a ground-state complex. Instead it seems that the<br />

apparent static component is due to the quencher being<br />

adjacent to the fluorophore at the moment <strong>of</strong> excitation.<br />

These closely spaced fluorophore–quencher pairs are<br />

immediately quenched, and thus appear to be dark complexes.<br />

This type <strong>of</strong> apparent static quenching is usually interpreted<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> a "sphere <strong>of</strong> action" within which the<br />

probability <strong>of</strong> quenching is unity. The modified form <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Stern-Volmer equation that describes this situation is<br />

F 0<br />

F (1 K DQ) exp(QVN/1000)<br />

(8.24)<br />

where V is the volume <strong>of</strong> the sphere. 22 The data in Figures<br />

8.6 and 8.7 are consistent with a sphere radius near 10 Å,<br />

which is only slightly larger than the sum <strong>of</strong> the radii <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fluorophore and quencher. When the fluorophore and<br />

quencher are this close, there exists a high probability that<br />

quenching will occur before these molecules diffuse apart.<br />

As the quencher concentration increases, the probability<br />

increases that a quencher is within the first solvent shell <strong>of</strong><br />

the fluorophore at the moment <strong>of</strong> excitation.<br />

8.6.1. Derivation <strong>of</strong> the Quenching Sphere<br />

<strong>of</strong> Action<br />

Assume the existence <strong>of</strong> a sphere <strong>of</strong> volume V within which<br />

the probability <strong>of</strong> immediate quenching is unity. Intuitively,<br />

if a fluorophore is excited when a quencher is immediately<br />

adjacent, then this fluorophore is quenched and is therefore<br />

unobservable. The only observable fluorophores are those<br />

for which there are no adjacent quenchers. The modified<br />

form <strong>of</strong> Stern-Volmer eq. 8.24 is derived by calculating the<br />

fraction <strong>of</strong> fluorophores that does not contain a quencher<br />

within its surrounding sphere <strong>of</strong> action. 22<br />

The probability <strong>of</strong> finding a number (n) <strong>of</strong> quenchers<br />

molecules in a given volume can be calculated from the<br />

Poisson distribution:<br />

P(n) λn<br />

n! eλ<br />

(8.25)<br />

where λ is the mean number <strong>of</strong> quenchers per volume V.<br />

The average concentration in molecules/cm 3 is given by<br />

[Q]N/1000, so the average number <strong>of</strong> molecules in the<br />

sphere is λ = V[Q]N/1000. Only those fluorophores without<br />

nearby quenchers are fluorescent. The probability that no<br />

quenchers are nearby is<br />

P(0) e λ<br />

(8.26)<br />

Thus, the existence <strong>of</strong> the sphere <strong>of</strong> action reduces the proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> observable fluorophores by the factor<br />

exp(–V[Q]N/1000), which in turn yields eq. 8.24. Division

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!