22.07.2013 Views

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

894 ANSWERS TO PROBLEMS<br />

A1.4. A. The anisotropy <strong>of</strong> the DENS-labeled protein is<br />

given by eq. 1.10. Using τ = θ, the steady-state<br />

anisotropy is expected to be 0.15.<br />

B. If the protein binds to the larger antibody, its<br />

rotational correlation time will increase to 100<br />

ns or longer. Hence the anisotropy will be<br />

0.23 or higher. Such increases in anisotropy<br />

upon antigen–antibody binding are the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fluorescence polarization immunoassays,<br />

which are used to detect drugs, peptides,<br />

and small proteins in clinical samples.<br />

A1.5. The dependence <strong>of</strong> transfer efficiency on distance<br />

(r) between a donor and acceptor can be calculated<br />

using eq. 1.12 (Figure 1.41). At r = R 0 the efficiency<br />

is 50%; at r = 0.5R 0 , E = 0.98; and at r = 2R 0 , E<br />

= 0.02.<br />

Figure 1.41. Effect <strong>of</strong> donor-to-acceptor distance on transfer<br />

efficiency.<br />

A1.6. The distance can be calculated for the relative<br />

quantum yield <strong>of</strong> the donor in the presence or<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> the acceptor. The data in Figure 1.37<br />

reveal a relative tryptophan intensity <strong>of</strong> 0.37,<br />

assuming the anthraniloyl group does not contribute<br />

at 340 nm. A transfer efficiency <strong>of</strong> 63% corresponds<br />

(see eq. 1.12) to a distance <strong>of</strong> r = 0.92R 0<br />

= 27.7 Å.<br />

In reality the actual calculation is more complex,<br />

and the tryptophan intensity needs to be corrected<br />

for anthraniloyl emission. 42 When this is done the<br />

transfer efficiency is found to be about 63%, and<br />

the distance near 31.9 Å.<br />

A1.7. The changes in λ max , K, and r shown in Figure 1.38<br />

are the result <strong>of</strong> the tryptophan residue being<br />

exposed to or shielded from the water. Increases in<br />

λ max and K indicate increased exposure to water,<br />

and decreases in λ max and K indicate decreases in<br />

exposure to water. Increases and decreases in r<br />

indicate a less mobile and more mobile tryptophan<br />

residue, respectively. The three parameter values<br />

show a cyclical behavior with a period <strong>of</strong> about 3.5<br />

amino acid residues per cycle. This suggests that<br />

the MLCK peptide is in an α-helical state when<br />

bound to calmodulin (Figure 1.42). The spectral<br />

changes seen in Figure 1.38 are the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tryptophan residue being alternately exposed to<br />

water or shielded between the MLCK peptide and<br />

calmodulin as its position is shifted along the peptide<br />

chain.<br />

Figure 1.42. Schematic <strong>of</strong> the interactions <strong>of</strong> the ?-helical MLCK<br />

peptide with calmodulin. The position <strong>of</strong> the single tryptophan residue<br />

is moved along the helix in 16 synthetic peptides. Reprinted with permission<br />

from [40]. (O'Neil KT, Wolfe HR, Erickson-Vitanen S,<br />

DeGrado WF. 1987. <strong>Fluorescence</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> calmodulin-binding<br />

peptides reflect ?-helical periodicity. Science 236:1454–1456,<br />

Copyright © 1987, American Association for the Advancement <strong>of</strong><br />

Science.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!