22.07.2013 Views

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

512 ENERGY TRANSFER TO MULTIPLE ACCEPTORS IN ONE,TWO, OR THREE DIMENSIONS<br />

In this particular case the ratio C/C 0 is the number <strong>of</strong><br />

acceptor molecules within a linear distance R 0 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

donor. For one-, two-, and three-dimensional distributions<br />

<strong>of</strong> acceptors there exist components that decay as t 1/6 , t 1/3 ,<br />

and t 1/2 , respectively. Values <strong>of</strong> the gamma function can be<br />

found from standard mathematical tables using Γ(α + 1) =<br />

αΓ(α). One may be interested in obtaining the relative<br />

quantum yields <strong>of</strong> the donor. While such expressions are<br />

available in one and two dimensions, these are infinite<br />

series and not closed-form expressions. With presently<br />

available computers and s<strong>of</strong>tware it is equally easy to use<br />

numerical integration <strong>of</strong> eqs. 15.1, 15.9, and 15.12 to obtain<br />

the transfer donor efficiency. For C = C 0 , where γ = β = δ =<br />

1.0, the energy transfer efficiencies are 72, 66, and 63%,<br />

respectively, in three, two, and one dimensions. A graph <strong>of</strong><br />

the relative donor yields is given in Problem 15.3.<br />

Prior to examining experimental data it is <strong>of</strong> interest to<br />

examine the forms <strong>of</strong> the donor decays. The effects <strong>of</strong><br />

dimensionality on RET are shown using simulated data in<br />

Figure 15.6. For these simulations the acceptor concentrations<br />

were taken as equal to the values <strong>of</strong> C 0 , which allowed<br />

the forms <strong>of</strong> intensity decays to be compared. As the dimensionality<br />

is reduced the time-domain intensity decays show<br />

an increased contribution <strong>of</strong> the short-time components,<br />

which are faster in one than in three dimensions. The difference<br />

in the intensity decay can also be seen in the frequency-domain<br />

simulations. These simulations suggest that the<br />

time-resolved decays can be used to determine the dimensionality<br />

<strong>of</strong> the system. In fact, analysis <strong>of</strong> the simulated<br />

frequency-domain data showed that the decay for onedimensional<br />

RET could not be analyzed in terms <strong>of</strong> RET in<br />

two or three dimensions, and vice versa. 17–18 That is, the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> the intensity decays are unique in each dimension.<br />

In such studies the geometry <strong>of</strong> the system is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

described as a combination <strong>of</strong> one, two, or three dimensions.<br />

Several groups have described the use <strong>of</strong> RET to<br />

determine the fractal dimensions <strong>of</strong> molecular surfaces. 19–21<br />

15.2.1. Experimental FRET in Two Dimensions<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> the considerable interest in membrane organization,<br />

there have been relatively few time-resolved studies<br />

<strong>of</strong> RET in two dimensions. We will now describe two<br />

reports, one that confirmed the expected decay in two<br />

dimensions 22 (eq. 15.9) and one report that found more<br />

complex behavior. 23<br />

Energy transfer in two dimensions was examined using<br />

octadecyl rhodamine B (ORB) as the donor to a membrane-<br />

Figure 15.6. Effect <strong>of</strong> FRET in one-, two-, or three-dimension on the<br />

donor intensity decays. From [17].<br />

bound cyanine dye, DiIC 1 (7), which served as the acceptor<br />

(Figure 15.7). These dyes were dispersed in large unilamellar<br />

vesicles <strong>of</strong> dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC).<br />

The intensity decays <strong>of</strong> ORB became more rapid in vesicles<br />

containing increasing concentrations <strong>of</strong> the acceptor (Figure<br />

15.7). When the temperature was above the lipid transition<br />

temperature the data were adequately fit to the twodimensional<br />

intensity decay law. The data for temperatures<br />

above and below the phase-transition temperature were fit<br />

to a general expression:<br />

IDA(t) exp [ t<br />

c ( τD t ) τD d/6<br />

]<br />

(15.15)<br />

where time-independent c is a constant 21 and d depends on<br />

dimensionality. The constant c is related to the surface den-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!