22.07.2013 Views

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRINCIPLES OF FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY 829<br />

Figure 24.43. Association <strong>of</strong> prion proteins (PrP) by dual wavelength<br />

cross-correlation FCS. PrP were labeled with either Cy5 or Oregon<br />

Green (OG). Revised from [139].<br />

(MW) 1/3 . The use <strong>of</strong> FCS to measure the hydrodynamics<br />

and internal dynamics <strong>of</strong> macromolecules is promising<br />

because the timescale is not limited by fluorescence lifetimes.<br />

However, there have been relatively few publications<br />

on rotational diffusion 148–152 because there are a number <strong>of</strong><br />

physical limitations and technical challenges. To measure<br />

rotational motions using FCS it is necessary to account for<br />

photon antibunching and triplet formation, which can occur<br />

on the same timescale as rotational diffusion.<br />

In a typical FCS experiment the timescale <strong>of</strong> interest is<br />

the diffusion time τ D , which is usually much longer than the<br />

fluorescence lifetime τ F . Hence there is time for the fluorophore<br />

to return to the ground state to be excited again<br />

while still in the observed volume. However, rotational correlation<br />

times θ are usually comparable to the lifetimes and<br />

much shorter than the diffusion times. In order to observe a<br />

correlation it is necessary to detect more than a single photon<br />

from the molecule before its orientation is randomized<br />

by rotational diffusion. While the fluorophore is in the<br />

excited state it cannot be excited again. As a result there is<br />

always some time delay, comparable to the fluorescence<br />

lifetime, between detection <strong>of</strong> two photons from the same<br />

fluorophore. This delay is called photon antibunching, to<br />

Figure 24.44. Coincidence analysis to detect λ phage DNA. Coincidence<br />

events are shown by the vertical dashed lines. Revised and<br />

reprinted with permission from [143]. Copyright © 1997, American<br />

Chemical Society.<br />

indicate that detection <strong>of</strong> a second photon is statistically<br />

less probably as the time delay becomes smaller. 153–155<br />

An optical configuration for anisotropy FCS (AFCS) is<br />

shown in Figure 24.45. The sample is excited with polarized<br />

light. The emission is observed using two detectors.<br />

The emission is split by a beamsplitter that randomly transmits<br />

or reflects the photons. The detection electronics is<br />

similar to that used for TCSPC. The difference in arrival<br />

times <strong>of</strong> the emitted photons is measured with the timedomain<br />

electronics. Because the photons are randomly distributed<br />

the first photon can arrive in either channel, so the<br />

correlation function will appear to be symmetrical around τ<br />

= 0. Figure 24.45 shows polarizers in the emission light<br />

paths, but they are not necessary because photoselection<br />

occurs upon excitation.<br />

The theory for AFCS can be complex, 148–149 so we will<br />

present the simplest case. Assume that the lifetime τ F is<br />

much shorter than the rotational correlation time θ, and that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!