05.08.2013 Views

Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop - Carnivore ...

Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop - Carnivore ...

Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop - Carnivore ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ural areas (hereafter, developed zone) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same region. We tested whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

anthropogenic and natural barriers limited puma movements and, thus, connectivity<br />

within landscapes. Finally, we examined whe<strong>the</strong>r developed-zone pumas preferentially<br />

used or avoided diminishing size-classes <strong>of</strong> residential property parcels within animals’<br />

home range areas. We asked whe<strong>the</strong>r pumas’ use <strong>of</strong> parcels by size differed between day<br />

and night, suggesting responses to human activity levels. We focused on this wideranging<br />

species to identify threats to habitat connectivity likely to impact local wildlife<br />

communities (Noss et al. 1996, Terborgh et al. 1999), and to facilitate regional<br />

conservation planning.<br />

Study area<br />

We conducted this study in Sierra, Nevada, Placer, El Dorado and Amador counties, in<br />

California’s western Sierra Nevada <strong>Mountain</strong>s and foothills. The western portion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se adjoining rural counties borders <strong>the</strong> agricultural Central Valley and <strong>the</strong> Sacramento<br />

metropolitan area. Elevation ranges from sea level in <strong>the</strong> west to over 2500 m at <strong>the</strong><br />

Sierra Nevada crest. River canyons running roughly east-west separate mountain ridges<br />

in <strong>the</strong> higher elevations. Most private and residential lands are in <strong>the</strong> western foothills,<br />

characterized by oak-dominated (Quercus sp.) woodlands and chaparral. Eastward,<br />

vegetation transitions with rising elevation to conifer forests. This area is primarily nonresidential<br />

timberlands, networked by logging roads. An urban/wildland interface<br />

corresponding to housing density on private versus public lands, typically national<br />

forests, transected our study area and was used to define <strong>the</strong> “developed” versus<br />

“undeveloped zone” (Fig. 1). Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> counties’ areas provide puma habitat,<br />

excluding only valley agricultural lands, urban areas, and <strong>the</strong> high elevation zones <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sierra crest.<br />

The area supports populations <strong>of</strong> mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), black bear (Ursus<br />

americana) and puma, but represents a region <strong>of</strong> ecological concern. Large, contiguous<br />

regions at high elevations are protected from land conversion as national forests,<br />

wilderness and o<strong>the</strong>r public land designations, while o<strong>the</strong>r areas are privately managed<br />

timberlands. In contrast, <strong>the</strong> western foothills are largely privately owned. Traditional<br />

grazing land is being converted to ranchette-style settlement, or o<strong>the</strong>r uses such as<br />

vineyards and orchards. The area is intersected north-south by high-traffic highways US<br />

Route 50 and I-80, which serve as corridors for development emanating from <strong>the</strong><br />

Sacramento metropolitan area.<br />

Placer County had <strong>the</strong> fastest growing human population in California with a projected<br />

27.6% increase from 2000 to 2005 (US Census Bureau 2007). Population increased by<br />

9.6%, 13.1%, and 6.9% in Amador, El Dorado, and Nevada Counties respectively, during<br />

<strong>the</strong> same period. In Nevada County, <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> undeveloped land zoned for<br />

residential or commercial development was 3.5 times <strong>the</strong> county’s developed land area<br />

(Walker et al. 2003). Over 60% <strong>of</strong> El Dorado County’s undeveloped private land was<br />

zoned for residential (0.4 to 8-ha or 1- to 20-acre) or exurban (8- to 16-ha or 20- to 40acre)<br />

development (Stoms 2004). In Placer County, 93% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> foothills were privately<br />

<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ninth</strong> <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> <strong>Workshop</strong><br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!