05.08.2013 Views

Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop - Carnivore ...

Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop - Carnivore ...

Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop - Carnivore ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cougar-Induced Vigilance in Ungulate Prey: Does Predator Proximity<br />

Matter?<br />

David M. Choate, Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame, 107<br />

Galvin Life Sciences, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA, dchoate@nd.edu<br />

Gary E. Belovsky, Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame, 107<br />

Galvin Life Sciences, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA, belovsky.1@nd.edu<br />

Michael L. Wolfe, Department <strong>of</strong> Wildland Resources, Utah State University, 5230 Old<br />

Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-5230, USA, michael.wolfe@usu.edu<br />

ABSTRACT Trading foraging time with increased vigilance is widely attributed to <strong>the</strong><br />

threat <strong>of</strong> predation. Numerous studies examining <strong>the</strong> relationship between vigilance and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r factors (e.g., prey’s herd size, habitat use) suggest that clear patterns are elusive and<br />

that vigilance per se may be highly plastic. If vigilance is costly by reducing feeding<br />

time, prey should reduce vigilance as <strong>the</strong> distance to a predator (or threat) increases,<br />

resulting in a scaled response even within factors (e.g., specific habitat types). In this<br />

study we used focal sampling <strong>of</strong> foraging bouts by 3 species <strong>of</strong> ungulates that differed in<br />

body size and anti-predator defenses (elk, Cervus elaphus; mule deer, Odocoileus<br />

hemionus; and white-tailed deer, O. virginianus), to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r proximity <strong>of</strong> a<br />

stalking/ambush predator (cougar, Puma concolor) influences time spent vigilant while<br />

foraging. For all 3 species males spent less time vigilant than females. There was no<br />

evidence for a herd-size effect on vigilance for any species, but white-tails displayed a<br />

significant decline in vigilance with increasing distance to cougars. Both deer species<br />

responded to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a cougar within <strong>the</strong> same drainage or “viewshed”, by<br />

decreasing vigilance levels with increasing distance. When cougar were outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

viewshed, <strong>the</strong>re was no longer a relationship between cougar proximity and vigilance<br />

levels. Prey-specific anti-predator responses to cougar, a stalking predator, suggest that<br />

generalizations <strong>of</strong> vigilance to o<strong>the</strong>r predator types (e.g., coursing predators) is<br />

inappropriate, and that vigilance as a metric for determining population levels <strong>of</strong><br />

predation risk may be less appropriate for communities with low-density solitary felids<br />

such as cougar, except at very small (i.e., within viewshed) temporal-spatial scales.<br />

<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ninth</strong> <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> <strong>Workshop</strong><br />

255

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!