Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop - Carnivore ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3. Cougar mortalities in Oregon by source of mortality, 1987 – 2007. Human/Pet Livestock Administrative Year Hunting Safety Conflict Removal Other Total 1987 129 2 8 0 3 142 1988 136 3 13 0 10 162 1989 116 1 15 0 13 145 1990 201 3 29 0 18 251 1991 124 4 22 0 12 162 1992 184 3 17 0 22 226 1993 162 7 20 0 21 210 1994 199 11 29 0 20 259 1995 22 22 41 0 12 97 1996 43 34 64 0 25 166 1997 61 20 82 0 18 181 1998 110 20 93 0 17 240 1999 169 39 91 0 25 324 2000 188 27 120 0 17 352 2001 220 27 98 0 21 366 2002 232 25 111 0 35 403 2003 248 28 110 0 25 411 2004 265 28 95 0 35 423 2005 224 28 125 0 30 407 2006 289 26 105 0 32 452 2007 308 21 113 52 41 535 a Proactive administrative removal in selected targeted areas began in 2007. price, inclusion of a cougar tag in a reduced price multiple-tag package available to resident hunters. A second tag has been available statewide since 2006. Concurrent with increasing cougar hunter numbers, overall hunter success rates have dropped from 40-50% when hounds were legal to ≤1%. However, hunter harvest has continued to slowly increase to levels greater than when hounds were legal for hunting (Table 3). Between 85 – 96% of the cougar harvest occurs incidental to hunting other species such as deer and elk. From 48 – 62% of the harvest is males. Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop 26
Population Status and Trend Status of cougar populations in Oregon is monitored using a deterministic computer model (Keister and Van Dyke 2002) adapted to represent population changes at the regional level, characteristics of the harvest, and trends in non-hunting mortalities. Modeled population trend continues to increase (Fig. 3). However, as total mortality has increased (Table 3), and populations approach assumed density dependence limits in the model, growth rate in the modeled population has declined and is approaching zero (Fig. 3). Modeled Population 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1994 1995 Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D Zone E Zone F Growth 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Figure 3. Modeled (Keister and Van Dyke) cougar population growth in Oregon, 1994–2007. 0.14 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop 27 0.1 0 Growth Rate
Page 1 and 2: Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain L
Page 3 and 4: IN REMEMBRANCE There are giants who
Page 5 and 6: Distinguished Service Awards Mauric
Page 7 and 8: North Dakota Dorothy Fescke .......
Page 9 and 10: Evaluation of noninvasive genetic s
Page 11 and 12: Survival and ages of cougars harves
Page 13 and 14: Preface Chronology of Mountain Lion
Page 15 and 16: 9 th Mtn. Lion Workshop Agenda Coug
Page 17 and 18: 10:35-10:55 Estimating lion populat
Page 19 and 20: Movements of a female cougar on the
Page 21 and 22: State and Province Mountain Lion St
Page 23 and 24: 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Lions
Page 25 and 26: somewhat stable, though overall abu
Page 27 and 28: Idaho Cougar Ages 2002 2003 2004 20
Page 29 and 30: and that occurred in 1999 to a 13-y
Page 31 and 32: the approximately 15 other bills in
Page 33 and 34: for Project CAT; his primary focus
Page 35 and 36: Oregon Mountain Lion Status Report
Page 37: cougar seasons are 10 months long (
Page 41 and 42: California Mountain Lion Status Rep
Page 43 and 44: Number (i) The permit does not inva
Page 45 and 46: The steps in responding to a public
Page 47 and 48: during the attack, objects chewed o
Page 49 and 50: Montana Mountain Lion Status Report
Page 51 and 52: Red Desert basin. Mixed conifer and
Page 53 and 54: Table 1. Wyoming mountain lion mana
Page 55 and 56: (Fig. 4). Approximately 90% of all
Page 57 and 58: - Use of rubber bullets - Use of pe
Page 59 and 60: Literature Cited Anderson, C.R., JR
Page 61 and 62: Genetic Monitoring A recent study b
Page 63 and 64: Literature Cited Anderson, C. R., F
Page 65 and 66: Mule deer and bighorn sheep hunting
Page 67 and 68: In 1981, the Harvest Objective hunt
Page 69 and 70: more than 10% of Nevada’s 286,298
Page 71 and 72: Future Research The Department is c
Page 73 and 74: Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW
Page 75 and 76: Figure 1. Wildlife Management Units
Page 77 and 78: Figure 2. Cougar habitat in Utah. A
Page 79 and 80: Table 1. Utah cougar harvests, 1989
Page 81 and 82: while encouraging some hunter selec
Page 83 and 84: State’s management objectives (ma
Page 85 and 86: Stoner, D. C., W. Reith, M.L. Wolfe
Page 87 and 88: Figure 1. Colorado mountain lion Da
Page 89 and 90:
Percent Q. Achievement & Success 65
Page 91 and 92:
in which we request voluntary reduc
Page 93 and 94:
Figure 6 is preliminary information
Page 95 and 96:
humans, predation on pets, hobby st
Page 97 and 98:
Arizona Mountain Lion Status Report
Page 99 and 100:
Hunt Regulations Since the 8 th Mou
Page 101 and 102:
The AZGFD supports the Cooperative
Page 103 and 104:
South Dakota Mountain Lion Status R
Page 105 and 106:
National Park [TRNP], Three Affilia
Page 107 and 108:
Mountain lion carcasses were weighe
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 2. Verified mountain lion lo
Page 111 and 112:
In 2007, eleven mountain lions (n =
Page 113 and 114:
increases or expansion. The overall
Page 115 and 116:
Florida Mountain Lion Status Report
Page 117 and 118:
interactions. Six categories of int
Page 119 and 120:
cases (a large breed dog, miniature
Page 121 and 122:
Interactions with Humans at the Urb
Page 123 and 124:
Demographic and Landscape Influence
Page 125 and 126:
Challenges and Opportunities Facing
Page 127 and 128:
Caloosahatchee River will be depend
Page 129 and 130:
Prospects for Mountain Lion Persist
Page 131 and 132:
Habitat Use and Movements Proceedin
Page 133 and 134:
Daily Movement Distances of Florida
Page 135 and 136:
Refining the Use of GPS Telemetry C
Page 137 and 138:
ural areas (hereafter, developed zo
Page 139 and 140:
owned, of which over 50% were zoned
Page 141 and 142:
Garmin ® (Garmin Ltd.) GPS units.
Page 143 and 144:
the steplength and turnangle distri
Page 145 and 146:
Table 1. Collar performance, time m
Page 147 and 148:
depredation on goats newly introduc
Page 149 and 150:
Paths derived from puma movement pa
Page 151 and 152:
Table 6 and Fig. 3 display the perc
Page 153 and 154:
even mortality from a heavily explo
Page 155 and 156:
parcels) and non-preferred habitat
Page 157 and 158:
CDFG 2000. California Department of
Page 159 and 160:
Stralberg, D. and B. Williams. 2002
Page 161 and 162:
Multi-Carnivore and Prey Interactio
Page 163 and 164:
subadults, and kittens, the study p
Page 165 and 166:
Cougar Home Range Shifts and Appare
Page 167 and 168:
iomass, or directly when cougars ar
Page 169 and 170:
Mountain Lion Movement Patterns in
Page 171 and 172:
Genetics and Disease Proceedings of
Page 173 and 174:
and CO2 rifles and biopsy darts (bo
Page 175 and 176:
Estimation of the Bottleneck Size i
Page 177 and 178:
A Preliminary Retrospective on the
Page 179 and 180:
Population Estimation and Dynamics
Page 181 and 182:
Dynamics and Demography of a Centra
Page 183 and 184:
The Idaho Backcountry: Is it Still
Page 185 and 186:
Study Areas and Methods We selected
Page 187 and 188:
We calculated the proportion of res
Page 189 and 190:
Warren Adult Female Sub Female Sub
Page 191 and 192:
Harvest Rate Change Four long-term
Page 193 and 194:
had increased to over 25% of the co
Page 195 and 196:
editor. Proceedings of the Third Mo
Page 197 and 198:
Censusing Pumas by Categorizing Phy
Page 199 and 200:
Education and Social Issues Proceed
Page 201 and 202:
The Land of the Living Dead Comes A
Page 203 and 204:
Science and Education Working Toget
Page 205 and 206:
Her dad was a cougar hunter, so Eve
Page 207 and 208:
The Gray Whales’ Migration Journe
Page 209 and 210:
11) How do we manage real-time GPS
Page 211 and 212:
harvest is not allowed. This reflec
Page 213 and 214:
Key Concepts: Mountain Lion Managem
Page 215 and 216:
Dispersal Movements of Subadult Cou
Page 217 and 218:
Cougar Management Protocols: a Surv
Page 219 and 220:
Response percent Response percent 1
Page 221 and 222:
Table 2. Cougar population status b
Page 223 and 224:
Table 5. Responses to what informat
Page 225 and 226:
Rating average 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.
Page 227 and 228:
Throughout the US and Canada, appro
Page 229 and 230:
Percent Percent 100 90 80 70 60 50
Page 231 and 232:
Table 8. Agency responses to what c
Page 233 and 234:
the incident rated highest (67%). O
Page 235 and 236:
Brochures/pamphlets/factsheets News
Page 237 and 238:
In terms of education and outreach
Page 239 and 240:
Population Status A vital prerequis
Page 241 and 242:
agencies towards a standardized lan
Page 243 and 244:
Literature Cited Anderson, C. R., a
Page 245 and 246:
6) How does your agency solicit non
Page 247 and 248:
19a) Hunting information Number of
Page 249 and 250:
Game Warden/Conservation Officer Pr
Page 251 and 252:
Cougars are not relocated when invo
Page 253 and 254:
Other (explain) 45) What approaches
Page 255 and 256:
Poster Session Proceedings of the N
Page 257 and 258:
Generating an Index of Relative Abu
Page 259 and 260:
Movements of a Female Cougar on the
Page 261 and 262:
Survival and Ages of Cougars Harves
Page 263 and 264:
Intra-specific Variation in Cougar
Page 265 and 266:
Cougars in British Columbia: Conser
Page 267 and 268:
Cougar-Induced Vigilance in Ungulat
Page 269 and 270:
List of Participants First Name Las
Page 271 and 272:
First Name Last Name Affiliation Ci
Page 273:
First Name Last Name Affiliation Ci
show all

Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop - Carnivore ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?