- Page 1: Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain L
- Page 5 and 6: Distinguished Service Awards Mauric
- Page 7 and 8: North Dakota Dorothy Fescke .......
- Page 9 and 10: Evaluation of noninvasive genetic s
- Page 11 and 12: Survival and ages of cougars harves
- Page 13 and 14: Preface Chronology of Mountain Lion
- Page 15 and 16: 9 th Mtn. Lion Workshop Agenda Coug
- Page 17 and 18: 10:35-10:55 Estimating lion populat
- Page 19 and 20: Movements of a female cougar on the
- Page 21 and 22: State and Province Mountain Lion St
- Page 23 and 24: 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Lions
- Page 25 and 26: somewhat stable, though overall abu
- Page 27 and 28: Idaho Cougar Ages 2002 2003 2004 20
- Page 29 and 30: and that occurred in 1999 to a 13-y
- Page 31 and 32: the approximately 15 other bills in
- Page 33 and 34: for Project CAT; his primary focus
- Page 35 and 36: Oregon Mountain Lion Status Report
- Page 37 and 38: cougar seasons are 10 months long (
- Page 39 and 40: Population Status and Trend Status
- Page 41 and 42: California Mountain Lion Status Rep
- Page 43 and 44: Number (i) The permit does not inva
- Page 45 and 46: The steps in responding to a public
- Page 47 and 48: during the attack, objects chewed o
- Page 49 and 50: Montana Mountain Lion Status Report
- Page 51 and 52: Red Desert basin. Mixed conifer and
- Page 53 and 54:
Table 1. Wyoming mountain lion mana
- Page 55 and 56:
(Fig. 4). Approximately 90% of all
- Page 57 and 58:
- Use of rubber bullets - Use of pe
- Page 59 and 60:
Literature Cited Anderson, C.R., JR
- Page 61 and 62:
Genetic Monitoring A recent study b
- Page 63 and 64:
Literature Cited Anderson, C. R., F
- Page 65 and 66:
Mule deer and bighorn sheep hunting
- Page 67 and 68:
In 1981, the Harvest Objective hunt
- Page 69 and 70:
more than 10% of Nevada’s 286,298
- Page 71 and 72:
Future Research The Department is c
- Page 73 and 74:
Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW
- Page 75 and 76:
Figure 1. Wildlife Management Units
- Page 77 and 78:
Figure 2. Cougar habitat in Utah. A
- Page 79 and 80:
Table 1. Utah cougar harvests, 1989
- Page 81 and 82:
while encouraging some hunter selec
- Page 83 and 84:
State’s management objectives (ma
- Page 85 and 86:
Stoner, D. C., W. Reith, M.L. Wolfe
- Page 87 and 88:
Figure 1. Colorado mountain lion Da
- Page 89 and 90:
Percent Q. Achievement & Success 65
- Page 91 and 92:
in which we request voluntary reduc
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 6 is preliminary information
- Page 95 and 96:
humans, predation on pets, hobby st
- Page 97 and 98:
Arizona Mountain Lion Status Report
- Page 99 and 100:
Hunt Regulations Since the 8 th Mou
- Page 101 and 102:
The AZGFD supports the Cooperative
- Page 103 and 104:
South Dakota Mountain Lion Status R
- Page 105 and 106:
National Park [TRNP], Three Affilia
- Page 107 and 108:
Mountain lion carcasses were weighe
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 2. Verified mountain lion lo
- Page 111 and 112:
In 2007, eleven mountain lions (n =
- Page 113 and 114:
increases or expansion. The overall
- Page 115 and 116:
Florida Mountain Lion Status Report
- Page 117 and 118:
interactions. Six categories of int
- Page 119 and 120:
cases (a large breed dog, miniature
- Page 121 and 122:
Interactions with Humans at the Urb
- Page 123 and 124:
Demographic and Landscape Influence
- Page 125 and 126:
Challenges and Opportunities Facing
- Page 127 and 128:
Caloosahatchee River will be depend
- Page 129 and 130:
Prospects for Mountain Lion Persist
- Page 131 and 132:
Habitat Use and Movements Proceedin
- Page 133 and 134:
Daily Movement Distances of Florida
- Page 135 and 136:
Refining the Use of GPS Telemetry C
- Page 137 and 138:
ural areas (hereafter, developed zo
- Page 139 and 140:
owned, of which over 50% were zoned
- Page 141 and 142:
Garmin ® (Garmin Ltd.) GPS units.
- Page 143 and 144:
the steplength and turnangle distri
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 1. Collar performance, time m
- Page 147 and 148:
depredation on goats newly introduc
- Page 149 and 150:
Paths derived from puma movement pa
- Page 151 and 152:
Table 6 and Fig. 3 display the perc
- Page 153 and 154:
even mortality from a heavily explo
- Page 155 and 156:
parcels) and non-preferred habitat
- Page 157 and 158:
CDFG 2000. California Department of
- Page 159 and 160:
Stralberg, D. and B. Williams. 2002
- Page 161 and 162:
Multi-Carnivore and Prey Interactio
- Page 163 and 164:
subadults, and kittens, the study p
- Page 165 and 166:
Cougar Home Range Shifts and Appare
- Page 167 and 168:
iomass, or directly when cougars ar
- Page 169 and 170:
Mountain Lion Movement Patterns in
- Page 171 and 172:
Genetics and Disease Proceedings of
- Page 173 and 174:
and CO2 rifles and biopsy darts (bo
- Page 175 and 176:
Estimation of the Bottleneck Size i
- Page 177 and 178:
A Preliminary Retrospective on the
- Page 179 and 180:
Population Estimation and Dynamics
- Page 181 and 182:
Dynamics and Demography of a Centra
- Page 183 and 184:
The Idaho Backcountry: Is it Still
- Page 185 and 186:
Study Areas and Methods We selected
- Page 187 and 188:
We calculated the proportion of res
- Page 189 and 190:
Warren Adult Female Sub Female Sub
- Page 191 and 192:
Harvest Rate Change Four long-term
- Page 193 and 194:
had increased to over 25% of the co
- Page 195 and 196:
editor. Proceedings of the Third Mo
- Page 197 and 198:
Censusing Pumas by Categorizing Phy
- Page 199 and 200:
Education and Social Issues Proceed
- Page 201 and 202:
The Land of the Living Dead Comes A
- Page 203 and 204:
Science and Education Working Toget
- Page 205 and 206:
Her dad was a cougar hunter, so Eve
- Page 207 and 208:
The Gray Whales’ Migration Journe
- Page 209 and 210:
11) How do we manage real-time GPS
- Page 211 and 212:
harvest is not allowed. This reflec
- Page 213 and 214:
Key Concepts: Mountain Lion Managem
- Page 215 and 216:
Dispersal Movements of Subadult Cou
- Page 217 and 218:
Cougar Management Protocols: a Surv
- Page 219 and 220:
Response percent Response percent 1
- Page 221 and 222:
Table 2. Cougar population status b
- Page 223 and 224:
Table 5. Responses to what informat
- Page 225 and 226:
Rating average 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.
- Page 227 and 228:
Throughout the US and Canada, appro
- Page 229 and 230:
Percent Percent 100 90 80 70 60 50
- Page 231 and 232:
Table 8. Agency responses to what c
- Page 233 and 234:
the incident rated highest (67%). O
- Page 235 and 236:
Brochures/pamphlets/factsheets News
- Page 237 and 238:
In terms of education and outreach
- Page 239 and 240:
Population Status A vital prerequis
- Page 241 and 242:
agencies towards a standardized lan
- Page 243 and 244:
Literature Cited Anderson, C. R., a
- Page 245 and 246:
6) How does your agency solicit non
- Page 247 and 248:
19a) Hunting information Number of
- Page 249 and 250:
Game Warden/Conservation Officer Pr
- Page 251 and 252:
Cougars are not relocated when invo
- Page 253 and 254:
Other (explain) 45) What approaches
- Page 255 and 256:
Poster Session Proceedings of the N
- Page 257 and 258:
Generating an Index of Relative Abu
- Page 259 and 260:
Movements of a Female Cougar on the
- Page 261 and 262:
Survival and Ages of Cougars Harves
- Page 263 and 264:
Intra-specific Variation in Cougar
- Page 265 and 266:
Cougars in British Columbia: Conser
- Page 267 and 268:
Cougar-Induced Vigilance in Ungulat
- Page 269 and 270:
List of Participants First Name Las
- Page 271 and 272:
First Name Last Name Affiliation Ci
- Page 273:
First Name Last Name Affiliation Ci