Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop - Carnivore ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

in effect on much of the State’s cougar range. Currently predator management plans are in place on 26 of 48 cougar management units or subunits open to harvest. In 1999, UDWR implemented a Nuisance Cougar Complaints policy (UDWR 1999a) to provide guidance for reducing damage to private property and reducing public safety concerns, and to provide direction to UDWR personnel responding to cougar depredation, nuisance, and human safety situations. Any cougar that preys upon livestock or pets or that poses a threat to human safety is euthanized, as are sick or injured adult cougars and kittens that are unable to care for themselves in the wild. The Division does not rehabilitate these animals. The only cougars that are captured and translocated are adults and subadults that wander into urban or suburban “no tolerance zones” in situations where they have not been aggressive toward humans, pets, or livestock. Distribution and Abundance Utah’s cougar habitat encompasses about 92,696 km 2 (35,790 mi 2, Fig. 2). Cougars are distributed throughout all available habitats within the state. Residential and commercial development is incrementally reducing cougar distribution through habitat alteration and destruction, particularly along the western border of the Wasatch Mountains in northern and central Utah. The last statewide cougar population estimates were developed in conjunction with the Utah Cougar Management Plan in 1999 (UDWR 1999b). These estimates used extrapolations of cougar densities from published studies in the southwestern United States to: 1) the total area within all management units that comprise cougar range, and 2) the total amount of occupied cougar habitat within Utah. The habitat quality within each management unit was classified as either high, medium or low based on vegetative characteristics, terrain ruggedness (following Riley 1998) and prey density. Cougar densities derived from research within Utah, California and New Mexico were associated with each habitat quality level (UDWR 1999b). High quality habitat was assigned a density range of 2.5-3.9 cougars/100 km 2 , medium quality habitat was assigned a density of 1.7-2.5 cougars/100 km 2 and a density of 0.26-0.52 cougar/100 km 2 was assigned to low quality habitat. The first statewide population estimate of 2,528-3,936 cougars resulted from summing unit population estimates. The number of cougars on each unit was estimated by first multiplying the total area contained within the unit by the highest density of the range assigned to it, and then by the lowest density of the range assigned to it. For comparison, a second estimate of 2,927 cougars statewide was generated based upon mean cougar densities and total occupied cougar habitat within the state. Each management unit’s cougar population was estimated by extrapolating the mean cougar density assigned to the unit (based on the respective range indicated above) to the amount of occupied cougar habitat within the unit, and unit estimates were summed to obtain the statewide figure. The two methods produced population estimates that show considerable agreement, but they should be only viewed as general approximations of the statewide cougar population. Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop 64
Figure 2. Cougar habitat in Utah. All colored areas represent occupied cougar habitat. Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop 65
Page 1 and 2:
Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain L
Page 3 and 4:
IN REMEMBRANCE There are giants who
Page 5 and 6:
Distinguished Service Awards Mauric
Page 7 and 8:
North Dakota Dorothy Fescke .......
Page 9 and 10:
Evaluation of noninvasive genetic s
Page 11 and 12:
Survival and ages of cougars harves
Page 13 and 14:
Preface Chronology of Mountain Lion
Page 15 and 16:
9 th Mtn. Lion Workshop Agenda Coug
Page 17 and 18:
10:35-10:55 Estimating lion populat
Page 19 and 20:
Movements of a female cougar on the
Page 21 and 22:
State and Province Mountain Lion St
Page 23 and 24:
160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Lions
Page 25 and 26: somewhat stable, though overall abu
Page 27 and 28: Idaho Cougar Ages 2002 2003 2004 20
Page 29 and 30: and that occurred in 1999 to a 13-y
Page 31 and 32: the approximately 15 other bills in
Page 33 and 34: for Project CAT; his primary focus
Page 35 and 36: Oregon Mountain Lion Status Report
Page 37 and 38: cougar seasons are 10 months long (
Page 39 and 40: Population Status and Trend Status
Page 41 and 42: California Mountain Lion Status Rep
Page 43 and 44: Number (i) The permit does not inva
Page 45 and 46: The steps in responding to a public
Page 47 and 48: during the attack, objects chewed o
Page 49 and 50: Montana Mountain Lion Status Report
Page 51 and 52: Red Desert basin. Mixed conifer and
Page 53 and 54: Table 1. Wyoming mountain lion mana
Page 55 and 56: (Fig. 4). Approximately 90% of all
Page 57 and 58: - Use of rubber bullets - Use of pe
Page 59 and 60: Literature Cited Anderson, C.R., JR
Page 61 and 62: Genetic Monitoring A recent study b
Page 63 and 64: Literature Cited Anderson, C. R., F
Page 65 and 66: Mule deer and bighorn sheep hunting
Page 67 and 68: In 1981, the Harvest Objective hunt
Page 69 and 70: more than 10% of Nevada’s 286,298
Page 71 and 72: Future Research The Department is c
Page 73 and 74: Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW
Page 75: Figure 1. Wildlife Management Units
Page 79 and 80: Table 1. Utah cougar harvests, 1989
Page 81 and 82: while encouraging some hunter selec
Page 83 and 84: State’s management objectives (ma
Page 85 and 86: Stoner, D. C., W. Reith, M.L. Wolfe
Page 87 and 88: Figure 1. Colorado mountain lion Da
Page 89 and 90: Percent Q. Achievement & Success 65
Page 91 and 92: in which we request voluntary reduc
Page 93 and 94: Figure 6 is preliminary information
Page 95 and 96: humans, predation on pets, hobby st
Page 97 and 98: Arizona Mountain Lion Status Report
Page 99 and 100: Hunt Regulations Since the 8 th Mou
Page 101 and 102: The AZGFD supports the Cooperative
Page 103 and 104: South Dakota Mountain Lion Status R
Page 105 and 106: National Park [TRNP], Three Affilia
Page 107 and 108: Mountain lion carcasses were weighe
Page 109 and 110: Figure 2. Verified mountain lion lo
Page 111 and 112: In 2007, eleven mountain lions (n =
Page 113 and 114: increases or expansion. The overall
Page 115 and 116: Florida Mountain Lion Status Report
Page 117 and 118: interactions. Six categories of int
Page 119 and 120: cases (a large breed dog, miniature
Page 121 and 122: Interactions with Humans at the Urb
Page 123 and 124: Demographic and Landscape Influence
Page 125 and 126: Challenges and Opportunities Facing
Page 127 and 128:
Caloosahatchee River will be depend
Page 129 and 130:
Prospects for Mountain Lion Persist
Page 131 and 132:
Habitat Use and Movements Proceedin
Page 133 and 134:
Daily Movement Distances of Florida
Page 135 and 136:
Refining the Use of GPS Telemetry C
Page 137 and 138:
ural areas (hereafter, developed zo
Page 139 and 140:
owned, of which over 50% were zoned
Page 141 and 142:
Garmin ® (Garmin Ltd.) GPS units.
Page 143 and 144:
the steplength and turnangle distri
Page 145 and 146:
Table 1. Collar performance, time m
Page 147 and 148:
depredation on goats newly introduc
Page 149 and 150:
Paths derived from puma movement pa
Page 151 and 152:
Table 6 and Fig. 3 display the perc
Page 153 and 154:
even mortality from a heavily explo
Page 155 and 156:
parcels) and non-preferred habitat
Page 157 and 158:
CDFG 2000. California Department of
Page 159 and 160:
Stralberg, D. and B. Williams. 2002
Page 161 and 162:
Multi-Carnivore and Prey Interactio
Page 163 and 164:
subadults, and kittens, the study p
Page 165 and 166:
Cougar Home Range Shifts and Appare
Page 167 and 168:
iomass, or directly when cougars ar
Page 169 and 170:
Mountain Lion Movement Patterns in
Page 171 and 172:
Genetics and Disease Proceedings of
Page 173 and 174:
and CO2 rifles and biopsy darts (bo
Page 175 and 176:
Estimation of the Bottleneck Size i
Page 177 and 178:
A Preliminary Retrospective on the
Page 179 and 180:
Population Estimation and Dynamics
Page 181 and 182:
Dynamics and Demography of a Centra
Page 183 and 184:
The Idaho Backcountry: Is it Still
Page 185 and 186:
Study Areas and Methods We selected
Page 187 and 188:
We calculated the proportion of res
Page 189 and 190:
Warren Adult Female Sub Female Sub
Page 191 and 192:
Harvest Rate Change Four long-term
Page 193 and 194:
had increased to over 25% of the co
Page 195 and 196:
editor. Proceedings of the Third Mo
Page 197 and 198:
Censusing Pumas by Categorizing Phy
Page 199 and 200:
Education and Social Issues Proceed
Page 201 and 202:
The Land of the Living Dead Comes A
Page 203 and 204:
Science and Education Working Toget
Page 205 and 206:
Her dad was a cougar hunter, so Eve
Page 207 and 208:
The Gray Whales’ Migration Journe
Page 209 and 210:
11) How do we manage real-time GPS
Page 211 and 212:
harvest is not allowed. This reflec
Page 213 and 214:
Key Concepts: Mountain Lion Managem
Page 215 and 216:
Dispersal Movements of Subadult Cou
Page 217 and 218:
Cougar Management Protocols: a Surv
Page 219 and 220:
Response percent Response percent 1
Page 221 and 222:
Table 2. Cougar population status b
Page 223 and 224:
Table 5. Responses to what informat
Page 225 and 226:
Rating average 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.
Page 227 and 228:
Throughout the US and Canada, appro
Page 229 and 230:
Percent Percent 100 90 80 70 60 50
Page 231 and 232:
Table 8. Agency responses to what c
Page 233 and 234:
the incident rated highest (67%). O
Page 235 and 236:
Brochures/pamphlets/factsheets News
Page 237 and 238:
In terms of education and outreach
Page 239 and 240:
Population Status A vital prerequis
Page 241 and 242:
agencies towards a standardized lan
Page 243 and 244:
Literature Cited Anderson, C. R., a
Page 245 and 246:
6) How does your agency solicit non
Page 247 and 248:
19a) Hunting information Number of
Page 249 and 250:
Game Warden/Conservation Officer Pr
Page 251 and 252:
Cougars are not relocated when invo
Page 253 and 254:
Other (explain) 45) What approaches
Page 255 and 256:
Poster Session Proceedings of the N
Page 257 and 258:
Generating an Index of Relative Abu
Page 259 and 260:
Movements of a Female Cougar on the
Page 261 and 262:
Survival and Ages of Cougars Harves
Page 263 and 264:
Intra-specific Variation in Cougar
Page 265 and 266:
Cougars in British Columbia: Conser
Page 267 and 268:
Cougar-Induced Vigilance in Ungulat
Page 269 and 270:
List of Participants First Name Las
Page 271 and 272:
First Name Last Name Affiliation Ci
Page 273:
First Name Last Name Affiliation Ci
show all

Proceedings of the Ninth Mountain Lion Workshop - Carnivore ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?