history of meals for millions, soy, and freedom from ... - SoyInfo Center
history of meals for millions, soy, and freedom from ... - SoyInfo Center
history of meals for millions, soy, and freedom from ... - SoyInfo Center
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
nutritional value, <strong>and</strong> (4) communicate the reactions to<br />
MFM.<br />
“In less than a year, letters <strong>and</strong> experience reports <strong>from</strong><br />
across the Atlantic <strong>and</strong> Pacific Oceans <strong>and</strong> <strong>from</strong> within the<br />
United States poured into the Foundation’s <strong>of</strong>fice with the<br />
welcome news that the trio had won its gamble.” Many<br />
testimonials follow (p. 51-55).<br />
“Equally laudatory reports arrived at Clifton’s<br />
Restaurant <strong>from</strong> Asian countries.” By late 1947 MFM <strong>and</strong><br />
MPF had become newsworthy enough to gain some<br />
mention on local, national, <strong>and</strong> trade publications, such as<br />
Time magazine, the New York Times, Soybean Digest, <strong>and</strong><br />
the Christian Science Monitor. In 1947 MFM donated<br />
500,00 <strong>meals</strong> to in an American project to send a<br />
“Friendship Train” across the United States to collect food<br />
<strong>for</strong> Europe. One result was more glowing newspaper<br />
coverage (p. 57-58). Continued. Address: Seattle,<br />
Washington.<br />
204. Roberts, Hibbert Rice. 1967. The Meals <strong>for</strong> Millions<br />
Foundation: a study <strong>of</strong> a non-governmental organization<br />
(Continued–Document Part IV). PhD thesis in Political<br />
Science, University <strong>of</strong> Washington. 288 leaves. [53 + 100+<br />
footnotes]<br />
• Summary: Continued: “From the outset MFM found mail<br />
appeals the most effective fund-raising device. Each appeal<br />
normally consisted <strong>of</strong> a <strong>for</strong>m letter carrying a message<br />
signed by the President <strong>of</strong> Meals <strong>for</strong> Millions, a<br />
‘Newsletter,’ <strong>and</strong> an addressed envelope <strong>for</strong> sending<br />
contributions to the Foundation. Usually written by Ernest<br />
Chamberlain, both the President’s cover letter <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Newsletter strive unabashedly to arouse the emotions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reader” (p. 58). The mail appeals were sent three times a<br />
year to a list <strong>of</strong> about 45,000 potential donors. The resulting<br />
contributions accounted <strong>for</strong> 60-70% <strong>of</strong> MFM’s budget.<br />
Dr. Ebright, who was deeply involved with the National<br />
Christian Council <strong>of</strong> India <strong>from</strong> 1947 to 1952, “found<br />
himself embroiled in the most turbulent <strong>and</strong> misery-filled<br />
period <strong>of</strong> Indian <strong>history</strong> as the partitioned sub-continent<br />
reeled <strong>from</strong> the upheaval <strong>and</strong> horror <strong>of</strong> communalism.” He<br />
was surprised <strong>and</strong> delighted to receive shipments <strong>of</strong> MPF in<br />
early 1948. He stated: “There was no doubt about it–<br />
wounds began to heal <strong>and</strong> doctors became enthusiastic, I<br />
then became one <strong>of</strong> the first Americans to use MPF in large<br />
quantities <strong>and</strong> I used it in our total relief program both in the<br />
north <strong>and</strong> south <strong>for</strong> the next 4 or 5 years.” He wrote about<br />
MPF at length in his book Free India published in 1954,<br />
five years be<strong>for</strong>e he joined MFM (p. 61-63).<br />
“Upon returning to the United States in 1960, Dr.<br />
Ebright visited MFM’s headquarters at the invitation <strong>of</strong><br />
Florence Rose, who then <strong>of</strong>fered him the position <strong>of</strong><br />
Director or Extension Services.” As a result <strong>of</strong> his work <strong>and</strong><br />
attendance at church conferences, “In 1961 the annual high<br />
MEALS FOR MILLIONS, SOY, AND FREEDOM FROM HUNGER 85<br />
© Copyright Soyinfo <strong>Center</strong> 2011<br />
<strong>of</strong> Methodist donations to MFM leaped <strong>from</strong> a previous<br />
high <strong>of</strong> $3,500 to one <strong>of</strong> $33,415” (p. 63).<br />
“From 1946 to 1962 Americans contributed $3,182,958<br />
to MFM–a disappointing sum in terms <strong>of</strong> the time <strong>and</strong><br />
energy poured into fund-raising by MFM’s staff <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />
<strong>and</strong> the severe limitations it has imposed upon the<br />
foundation’s capacity to respond to appeals <strong>for</strong> relief<br />
shipments <strong>of</strong> MPF <strong>and</strong> to stimulate overseas production <strong>of</strong><br />
MPF-type foods.” “Figures relating to MFM’s finances are<br />
based upon the annual financial audits <strong>of</strong> the Foundation’s<br />
records by the certified public accounting firm <strong>of</strong> Kahan,<br />
Seltzer, <strong>and</strong> Eckstein <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles” (p. 65).<br />
Table 4 (p. 66) shows the yearly income <strong>of</strong> MFM <strong>from</strong><br />
1946-47 to 1961-62. The following give a general idea <strong>of</strong><br />
the ups <strong>and</strong> downs: 1946–$60,916. 1947–$272,649. 1950–<br />
$41,658. 1955–$215,090. 1960–$285,204. 1961-62–<br />
$332,297.<br />
“... more than once Florence Rose <strong>and</strong> Ernest<br />
Chamberlain delayed paying themselves in order to meet the<br />
pay roll <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fice staff. In general, the instability <strong>and</strong><br />
inadequacy <strong>of</strong> MFM’s income generates an air <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />
crisis <strong>and</strong> frustration within the ranks <strong>of</strong> the Los Angeles<br />
staff as they struggle to fill the requests <strong>for</strong> relief shipments<br />
which stream into the <strong>of</strong>fice daily.<br />
“To make matters worse <strong>for</strong> MFM, the fundraising<br />
endeavors <strong>of</strong> Florence Rose <strong>and</strong> staff have been hampered<br />
by its relations to two key non-pr<strong>of</strong>it organizations in the<br />
American field <strong>of</strong> philanthropy. Particularly damaging has<br />
been MFM’s st<strong>and</strong>ing with the National In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
Bureau. Founded in 1918 ‘to maintain st<strong>and</strong>ards in the field<br />
<strong>of</strong> philanthropy <strong>and</strong> to aid thoughtful contributors to give<br />
wisely,’ the National In<strong>for</strong>mation Bureau (NIB) prepares<br />
<strong>and</strong> upon request sends to its subscribers evaluation reports<br />
about any <strong>of</strong> approximately 500 non-pr<strong>of</strong>it organizations<br />
that solicit contributions within the United States.” “NIB<br />
approval comes only when a non-pr<strong>of</strong>it organization<br />
complies with the following ‘basic st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong><br />
philanthropy.’” The headings are: Board. Purpose, Program,<br />
Cooperation, Ethical Promotion, Fund Raising, Audit, <strong>and</strong><br />
Budget. For a non-pr<strong>of</strong>it, winning NIB approval is almost<br />
essential to success. Meals <strong>for</strong> Millions never did win this<br />
approval. NIB’s evaluation <strong>of</strong> MFM found: The<br />
“Foundation’s board <strong>of</strong> directors was too small <strong>and</strong> too<br />
inactive to exercise adequate administrative control.”<br />
MFM’s literature “includes statements which are probably<br />
entirely inaccurate as to fact <strong>and</strong> other statements which are<br />
exceedingly questionable <strong>from</strong> the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong><br />
constructive relief. MFM’s slogan ‘3¢ buys a meal’<br />
apparently ignored the contributions <strong>of</strong> other voluntary<br />
agencies in providing the expensive services [such as<br />
transportation, warehousing, distribution, plus MFM’s<br />
fundraising costs] necessary to deliver the 3¢ meal to a<br />
consumer” (p. 67-69). Additional contentious issues arose<br />
over the years, <strong>for</strong> example: MPF was not cooked <strong>and</strong> thus