Making TransJakarta a World Class BRT System - ITDP | Institute for ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

thus, a passing lane at the station is not needed. This will help reduce the need to widen the right of way at bus stops and mitigate congestion impacts for mixed traffic. In summary, while four lanes are needed for general traffic to avoid an adverse congestion impact, there is no need to provide overtaking lane at bus stops in this section. VI.4.c. Segment Toll Road (Cempaka Mas) - Galur Flyover (2.5 km) This section is 2.5 km long, with no intersections, and 5 bus stops for the busway are being planned. VI.4.c.i. Typical existing cross section Here the cross sections is wide (about 64 meters), and about 35 meters is for traffic with 5 lanes per direction. Traffic volume analysis shows that 11.0 meters is enough for general traffic needs, so it is possible to use the existing paved section to implement the BRT. VI.4.c.ii. DisHub and ITDP Proposed Typical Cross Section for TransJakarta The existing project proposal is to cut the central island and separators to maintain the present 5 lanes for general traffic. The following figure compares ITDP and project proposals: Segment Cocacola – Galur Typical: Cempaka Mas, Yarsi, Lippo 150 80 80 130 170 360 670 360 1080 215 1050 250 710 210 Existing design 200 94 860 364 364 860 115 124 80 150 130 170 360 670 360 1080 215 1050 250 710 210 364 350 364 no need 200 to cut sidewalks and median 360 215 250 670 750 330 330 720 40 860 860 212 242 Final Recommendations for TransJakarta, p. 102 80 130 170 360 670 360 1080 215 1050 80250 710 210 710 679 Recommended by ITDP 210
The typical cross section corresponds to 80% of section. ITDP proposal avoids four small cuts on island to give (8.6 - 7.2) = 1.6 meters for the general traffic. VI.4.c.iii. DisHub and ITDP Proposed Cross Sections at Transjakarta Bus Stops ITDP proposal only uses four lanes for general traffic which consists of two express and two local lanes. Segment Cocacola – Galur Bus stop: Cempaka Mas, Yarsi, Lippo 150 80 80 130 170 360 670 360 1080 215 1050 250 710 210 360 400 670 673 300 300 672 250 710 210 no need to cut sidewalks and the median between slow-fast 200 lanes 94 860 364 364 860 115 80 150 130 170 360 670 360 1080 215 1050 250 710 210 124 Recommended by ITDP 364 350 364 Existing design 200 860 860 212 242 40 679 80 130 170 360 670 360 1080 215 1050 80250 710 210 The following photos show that presently a minimum of one lane is wasted on parking and in some cases only two lanes are available for general traffic. All photos were taken on afternoon peak on W > E direction. Final Recommendations for TransJakarta, p. 103
Page 1 and 2:
Making TransJakarta a World Class B
Page 3 and 4:
V. INCREASING THE BUSWAY’S CAPACI
Page 5 and 6:
The main reason the capacity on Tra
Page 7 and 8:
The Harmoni Station is a special pr
Page 9 and 10:
demand. If the single door bus and
Page 11 and 12:
The difference in terms of daily ri
Page 13 and 14:
This operational change would incre
Page 15 and 16:
I.7. Priorities for Next TransJakar
Page 17 and 18:
Lines Headway extension Travel time
Page 19 and 20:
While various BOT options are avail
Page 21 and 22:
That being said, pedestrian safety
Page 23 and 24:
II. INSTITUTIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS G
Page 25 and 26:
? DisHub procured a sub-optimal tic
Page 27 and 28:
had also visited BRT systems in Bra
Page 29 and 30:
encumber the TransJakarta BRT syste
Page 31 and 32:
An additional 34 buses were procure
Page 33 and 34:
Proposal to the City Maximum Points
Page 35 and 36:
indefinite period of time. In these
Page 37 and 38:
o 25 kilometers for stopping the bu
Page 39 and 40:
the greatest flexibility in terms o
Page 41 and 42:
prefer a ‘single-seat’ trip whe
Page 43 and 44:
principal contract. The software to
Page 45 and 46:
capability to do it, but they are n
Page 47 and 48:
operation would be public. In Bosto
Page 49 and 50:
TransJakarta’s ticketing departme
Page 51 and 52: The verification of the tickets sol
Page 53 and 54: trips, not a dollar amount. Each ti
Page 55 and 56: add value to cards should be stored
Page 57 and 58: IV.1. Projected Demand on Current C
Page 59 and 60: and Kota, and Kalideras and Kota),
Page 61 and 62: 14 3 7 8 9 6.5 3 6 Shops stairs inv
Page 63 and 64: Base scenario Lines Headway extensi
Page 65 and 66: IV. 3. Demand Impact of Different F
Page 67 and 68: Morning peak hour demand (paying pa
Page 69 and 70: If both the Blue and Green Lines ar
Page 71 and 72: The proposed fare was defined at Rp
Page 73 and 74: Jakarta - Desire Lines The current
Page 75 and 76: Passengers at Morning peak hour Lin
Page 77 and 78: Most urgently, TransJakarta should
Page 79 and 80: significant reduction of efficiency
Page 81 and 82: V.3.b. Mitigating Congestion Along
Page 83 and 84: V.3.e. Congestion Along Hayam Wuruk
Page 85 and 86: Existing Proposed 1 st S T A G E 2
Page 87 and 88: That being said, even after reconst
Page 89 and 90: VI. PHYSICAL DESIGN ISSUES ON CORRI
Page 91 and 92: For some high demand stations (such
Page 93 and 94: Corridor 2-3 Examples of minimum wi
Page 95 and 96: Bus Bus The offset of the pedestria
Page 97 and 98: Photo 2: Pulogadung - Flamboyan (Me
Page 99 and 100: VI.4.a.iii. ITDP and DisHub Suggest
Page 101: 3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 3 2 1 0 0 10 20 30
Page 105 and 106: Photo 6: Buses parking on express a
Page 107 and 108: traffic. This practice should not b
Page 109 and 110: ITDP recommendation (after the BRT
Page 111 and 112: Our proposal would be a simpler 2-p
Page 113 and 114: 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 2
Page 115 and 116: No suggestions, as right turns on c
Page 117 and 118: Photo 11: Roxy Mas trade center Rai
Page 119 and 120: 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 2
Page 121 and 122: 3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 3 2 1 0 3.5 3 2.5 2
Page 123 and 124: 3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 3 2 1 0 Type Sidewa
Page 125 and 126: U- turn capacity(fig 2 lay-out) Cap
Page 127 and 128: . . 1 2 Off course the present U-tu
Page 129 and 130: period, and the expansion of the da
Page 131 and 132: Globally, the calibration is very s
show all

Making TransJakarta a World Class BRT System - ITDP | Institute for ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?