Making TransJakarta a World Class BRT System - ITDP | Institute for ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scenario 1 Morning peak hour Lines Headway extension Travel time Boarding pax Max Volume Pax. paying # Bus running BM-KT 1.5 13.01 43.58 4412 3644 11523 63 820 KT-BM 1.5 13.02 43.61 2951 2678 63% KL-H 2.0 15.24 50.99 3187 2721 54 811 H-KL 2.0 14.78 49.45 1989 1976 PL-H 1.9 12.66 42.4 2747 2733 46 572 H-PL 1.9 12.19 40.8 2932 2791 TOTAL 80.9 18218 163 2202 While there are understandable political considerations involved, the decision to bypass the Senen Bus Station – and to a lesser extent the Railway Station – causes a significant loss of passengers. km Were the above itinerary used, demand on Corridor II and III would be much higher: Scenario 2 Morning peak hour Lines Headway extension Travel time Boarding pax Max Volume paying km BM-KT 1.4 13.01 43.58 4840 3942 12666 68 885 Pax. KT-BM 1.4 13.02 43.61 3913 3582 62% # Bus running KL-H 2.2 12.78 42.74 2528 2451 42 537 H-KL 2.2 12.78 42.74 2150 2150 PL-H 1.5 11.86 39.72 3930 3557 57 682 H-PL 1.5 12.06 40.39 3183 3023 TOTAL 75.5 20544 167 2104 Final Recommendations for TransJakarta, p. 10
The difference in terms of daily ridership on the system is significant: Daily Passengers Lines Scenario 1 Scenario 2 BM-KT 63445 69599 KT-BM 42435 56269 KL-H 45829 36353 H-KL 28602 30917 PL-H 39502 56513 H-PL 42162 45772 TOTAL 261975 295423 Because TransJakarta will not connect to the Senen Bus Station, TransJakarta will lose some 33,448 passengers per day. While the specific loss of revenue will depend on the fare structure and operational plan, this is a very significant loss of revenue. These loses should be weighed against the political difficulties of including Senen in the TransJakarta system. I.5. Optimizing TransJakarta Trunk Line Operational Efficiency Contracting out of the new TransJakarta bus operations to private operators will happen soon. Because of the coming congestion at Harmoni, it is imperative that TransJakarta and DKI Jakarta determine sooner rather than later what will be the operating routes for contracted lines. Final Recommendations for TransJakarta, p. 11
Page 1 and 2: Making TransJakarta a World Class B
Page 3 and 4: V. INCREASING THE BUSWAY’S CAPACI
Page 5 and 6: The main reason the capacity on Tra
Page 7 and 8: The Harmoni Station is a special pr
Page 9: demand. If the single door bus and
Page 13 and 14: This operational change would incre
Page 15 and 16: I.7. Priorities for Next TransJakar
Page 17 and 18: Lines Headway extension Travel time
Page 19 and 20: While various BOT options are avail
Page 21 and 22: That being said, pedestrian safety
Page 23 and 24: II. INSTITUTIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS G
Page 25 and 26: ? DisHub procured a sub-optimal tic
Page 27 and 28: had also visited BRT systems in Bra
Page 29 and 30: encumber the TransJakarta BRT syste
Page 31 and 32: An additional 34 buses were procure
Page 33 and 34: Proposal to the City Maximum Points
Page 35 and 36: indefinite period of time. In these
Page 37 and 38: o 25 kilometers for stopping the bu
Page 39 and 40: the greatest flexibility in terms o
Page 41 and 42: prefer a ‘single-seat’ trip whe
Page 43 and 44: principal contract. The software to
Page 45 and 46: capability to do it, but they are n
Page 47 and 48: operation would be public. In Bosto
Page 49 and 50: TransJakarta’s ticketing departme
Page 51 and 52: The verification of the tickets sol
Page 53 and 54: trips, not a dollar amount. Each ti
Page 55 and 56: add value to cards should be stored
Page 57 and 58: IV.1. Projected Demand on Current C
Page 59 and 60: and Kota, and Kalideras and Kota),
Page 61 and 62:
14 3 7 8 9 6.5 3 6 Shops stairs inv
Page 63 and 64:
Base scenario Lines Headway extensi
Page 65 and 66:
IV. 3. Demand Impact of Different F
Page 67 and 68:
Morning peak hour demand (paying pa
Page 69 and 70:
If both the Blue and Green Lines ar
Page 71 and 72:
The proposed fare was defined at Rp
Page 73 and 74:
Jakarta - Desire Lines The current
Page 75 and 76:
Passengers at Morning peak hour Lin
Page 77 and 78:
Most urgently, TransJakarta should
Page 79 and 80:
significant reduction of efficiency
Page 81 and 82:
V.3.b. Mitigating Congestion Along
Page 83 and 84:
V.3.e. Congestion Along Hayam Wuruk
Page 85 and 86:
Existing Proposed 1 st S T A G E 2
Page 87 and 88:
That being said, even after reconst
Page 89 and 90:
VI. PHYSICAL DESIGN ISSUES ON CORRI
Page 91 and 92:
For some high demand stations (such
Page 93 and 94:
Corridor 2-3 Examples of minimum wi
Page 95 and 96:
Bus Bus The offset of the pedestria
Page 97 and 98:
Photo 2: Pulogadung - Flamboyan (Me
Page 99 and 100:
VI.4.a.iii. ITDP and DisHub Suggest
Page 101 and 102:
3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 3 2 1 0 0 10 20 30
Page 103 and 104:
The typical cross section correspon
Page 105 and 106:
Photo 6: Buses parking on express a
Page 107 and 108:
traffic. This practice should not b
Page 109 and 110:
ITDP recommendation (after the BRT
Page 111 and 112:
Our proposal would be a simpler 2-p
Page 113 and 114:
3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 2
Page 115 and 116:
No suggestions, as right turns on c
Page 117 and 118:
Photo 11: Roxy Mas trade center Rai
Page 119 and 120:
3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 2
Page 121 and 122:
3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 3 2 1 0 3.5 3 2.5 2
Page 123 and 124:
3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 3 2 1 0 Type Sidewa
Page 125 and 126:
U- turn capacity(fig 2 lay-out) Cap
Page 127 and 128:
. . 1 2 Off course the present U-tu
Page 129 and 130:
period, and the expansion of the da
Page 131 and 132:
Globally, the calibration is very s
show all

Making TransJakarta a World Class BRT System - ITDP | Institute for ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?