Making TransJakarta a World Class BRT System - ITDP | Institute for ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

? ? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? Wijaya Kesuma Jelambar Jembatan Besi Kredang Grogol ?? Grogol Keagungan Duri Utara ? ? ?? ?? Tanah Seral Krukut Kalianyar Duri Selatan Duri Pulo Petojo Utara Maphar Kebon Kelapa Karang Anyar Pasar Baru Gunung Sahari Utara Kebon Kosong Kemayoran Serdang Sunter Jaya Kelapa Gading Barat Kelapa Gading Timur Kedoya Selatan Duri Kepa Tomang Tanjung Duren Selatan Petojo Selatan Gambir ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? Senen Bungur Jati Pulo Kayu Putih Kotabambu Selatan ? ? ?? ?? Kampung Bali ?? Kramat Tanah Tinggi Cempaka Putih Timur ?? Pulo Gadung Kemanggisan Kebon Kacang Meruya Utara Kebon Jeruk Slipi Kebon Kacang Kebon Melati Pulo Gadung ?? Palmerah Pejompongan Karet Menteng Utan Kayu Utara Srengseng Ulujami Petukangan Selatan Kelapa Dua Grogol Utara Grogol Selatan Kebayoran Lama Utara Gunung Taman Ria Senayan JCC Gelora Senayan Plaza Senayan Bendungan Hilir BEJ KOMDAK Kusuma Candra Selong Petogogan ?? Blok M Melawai Dharmala Sakti Pela Mampang Setia Budi Karet Guntur Taman Rasuna Karet Kuningan Ambasador Kuningan Timur Rawa Barat Kuningan Barat Casablanca Mampang Prapatan Pasar Manggis Menteng Dalam ?? Manggarai Saharjo Pancoran Pal Meriem Bukit Duri Sta.TEBET Menteng Dalam Tebet Barat Tebet Timur Kebon Baru ?? Kampung Melayu LEGEND Express Busway Cipinang Muara Tol Road Pondok Bambu railway ?? Proposed Monorail Green Line Proposed Monorail Blue Line Monorail Station Monorail Interchange Station Monorail Multimodal Station Bus Terminal railway Station monorail Coverage Area Kelurahan Klender Some restructuring of the actual bus system was taken in consideration, by cutting the bus routes with itineraries that overlap the monorail blue line, as illustrated as follow: Final Recommendations for TransJakarta, p. 70
The proposed fare was defined at Rp5000. Modal split and adjusted value of time were taken in account to represent the possible attraction of high middle class potential passengers. The results have to be considered as maximum potential demand, as the considerations that were made correspond to an optimistic scenario. Globally, the results reach only 20% of the demand estimated in the monorail project. Scenario 1 : With blue line only Morning peak hour Lines Headway extension Travel time Boarding pax Max Volume Pax. paying TEBET-ROXI 5.0 11.07 33.53 1049 772 1547 ROXI-TEBET 5.0 11.07 33.53 498 401 100% TOTAL 22.1 1547 Scenario 2: With blue line and green line Morning peak hour BLUE LINE + GREEN LINE Lines Headway extension Travel time Boarding pax Max Volume Pax. paying TEBET-ROXI 5.0 11.07 33.53 1175 836 1980 ROXI-TEBET 5.0 11.07 33.53 805 591 80% CLOCKWISE 5.0 14.61 44.02 98 74 COUNTER CLOCKWISE 5.0 14.61 44.02 382 286 TOTAL 51.4 2460 Even if the area around the green line can be of interest for demand, the blue line did not connect it with another interesting area, it did not correspond to some identified major desires lines of trips. A test with a BRT operating only the blue line, in addition with the projected first three BRT corridors, shows better results, because of the lowest fare (Rp2500) and of the interest of connectivity with the integrated BRT network, offering more choices for origins and destinations. Morning peak hour ITINERARY OF BLUE LINE OPERATED BY BRT Lines Headway extension Travel time Boarding pax Max Volume Pax. paying TEBET-ROXI 2.9 11.07 37.22 2876 1827 3201 ROXI-TEBET 2.9 11.07 37.22 2941 1834 55% TOTAL 22.1 5817 Daily Passengers summary Final Recommendations for TransJakarta, p. 71
Page 1 and 2:
Making TransJakarta a World Class B
Page 3 and 4:
V. INCREASING THE BUSWAY’S CAPACI
Page 5 and 6:
The main reason the capacity on Tra
Page 7 and 8:
The Harmoni Station is a special pr
Page 9 and 10:
demand. If the single door bus and
Page 11 and 12:
The difference in terms of daily ri
Page 13 and 14:
This operational change would incre
Page 15 and 16:
I.7. Priorities for Next TransJakar
Page 17 and 18:
Lines Headway extension Travel time
Page 19 and 20: While various BOT options are avail
Page 21 and 22: That being said, pedestrian safety
Page 23 and 24: II. INSTITUTIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS G
Page 25 and 26: ? DisHub procured a sub-optimal tic
Page 27 and 28: had also visited BRT systems in Bra
Page 29 and 30: encumber the TransJakarta BRT syste
Page 31 and 32: An additional 34 buses were procure
Page 33 and 34: Proposal to the City Maximum Points
Page 35 and 36: indefinite period of time. In these
Page 37 and 38: o 25 kilometers for stopping the bu
Page 39 and 40: the greatest flexibility in terms o
Page 41 and 42: prefer a ‘single-seat’ trip whe
Page 43 and 44: principal contract. The software to
Page 45 and 46: capability to do it, but they are n
Page 47 and 48: operation would be public. In Bosto
Page 49 and 50: TransJakarta’s ticketing departme
Page 51 and 52: The verification of the tickets sol
Page 53 and 54: trips, not a dollar amount. Each ti
Page 55 and 56: add value to cards should be stored
Page 57 and 58: IV.1. Projected Demand on Current C
Page 59 and 60: and Kota, and Kalideras and Kota),
Page 61 and 62: 14 3 7 8 9 6.5 3 6 Shops stairs inv
Page 63 and 64: Base scenario Lines Headway extensi
Page 65 and 66: IV. 3. Demand Impact of Different F
Page 67 and 68: Morning peak hour demand (paying pa
Page 69: If both the Blue and Green Lines ar
Page 73 and 74: Jakarta - Desire Lines The current
Page 75 and 76: Passengers at Morning peak hour Lin
Page 77 and 78: Most urgently, TransJakarta should
Page 79 and 80: significant reduction of efficiency
Page 81 and 82: V.3.b. Mitigating Congestion Along
Page 83 and 84: V.3.e. Congestion Along Hayam Wuruk
Page 85 and 86: Existing Proposed 1 st S T A G E 2
Page 87 and 88: That being said, even after reconst
Page 89 and 90: VI. PHYSICAL DESIGN ISSUES ON CORRI
Page 91 and 92: For some high demand stations (such
Page 93 and 94: Corridor 2-3 Examples of minimum wi
Page 95 and 96: Bus Bus The offset of the pedestria
Page 97 and 98: Photo 2: Pulogadung - Flamboyan (Me
Page 99 and 100: VI.4.a.iii. ITDP and DisHub Suggest
Page 101 and 102: 3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 3 2 1 0 0 10 20 30
Page 103 and 104: The typical cross section correspon
Page 105 and 106: Photo 6: Buses parking on express a
Page 107 and 108: traffic. This practice should not b
Page 109 and 110: ITDP recommendation (after the BRT
Page 111 and 112: Our proposal would be a simpler 2-p
Page 113 and 114: 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 2
Page 115 and 116: No suggestions, as right turns on c
Page 117 and 118: Photo 11: Roxy Mas trade center Rai
Page 119 and 120: 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 2
Page 121 and 122:
3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 3 2 1 0 3.5 3 2.5 2
Page 123 and 124:
3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 3 2 1 0 Type Sidewa
Page 125 and 126:
U- turn capacity(fig 2 lay-out) Cap
Page 127 and 128:
. . 1 2 Off course the present U-tu
Page 129 and 130:
period, and the expansion of the da
Page 131 and 132:
Globally, the calibration is very s
show all

Making TransJakarta a World Class BRT System - ITDP | Institute for ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?