02.05.2014 Views

Poverty Dimensions of Public Governance and Forest Management ...

Poverty Dimensions of Public Governance and Forest Management ...

Poverty Dimensions of Public Governance and Forest Management ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

25<br />

In many instances, the relationship has served the migrants well. However, the extensive (<strong>and</strong><br />

large unchecked) ‘traditional rights’ <strong>of</strong> the chiefs do allow them to impose a relationship <strong>of</strong><br />

clientage on their migrants, which can lead to some resentment.<br />

4.1.10 Natural Resource Tenure<br />

The 1962 Concessions Act vested all trees in Ghana in the Office <strong>of</strong> the President, to administer<br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> the ‘allodial authority’ (the chiefs). This gives the Ghana <strong>Forest</strong>ry Service control<br />

over all trees (particularly timber trees) whether in forest reserves or on farmers’ fields. In the<br />

latter case, farmers have no right to any royalty payments, although royalties are paid to the chief,<br />

the stool <strong>and</strong> to the district authority.<br />

While in the past, the timber industry was interested only in redwoods <strong>and</strong> the like, with export<br />

potential, increasing scarcity <strong>of</strong> timber trees <strong>and</strong> diversification <strong>of</strong> exports has increased its<br />

interest in what were hitherto unconsidered species. A formal ban on chainsaw production has<br />

further shifted access to timber away from farmers to the industry.<br />

For these <strong>and</strong> other reasons, production for local livelihoods has increasingly focused on<br />

charcoal, using species without potential as timber. As will be later discussed, this has brought<br />

small producers into increasing conflict with chiefs <strong>and</strong> district authorities (to whom charcoal<br />

represents a potentially lucrative source <strong>of</strong> income), as well as the environmental lobby, for<br />

whom charcoal is a major emblem <strong>of</strong> environmental degradation, even ‘desertification’.<br />

4.1.11 Supplementary livelihoods<br />

Around 46% <strong>of</strong> all men <strong>and</strong> 56% <strong>of</strong> women have supplementary <strong>of</strong>f-farm incomes. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />

men, these include natural-resource based (e.g. charcoal) <strong>and</strong> artisanal (e.g. tailoring) activities,<br />

<strong>and</strong> petty trading. For women the main income sources are petty trading (e.g. dressmaking),<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> cooked foods, <strong>and</strong> (in the case <strong>of</strong> Dagaaba migrants), brewing <strong>of</strong> pito (sorghum<br />

beer). Table 4.4 gives a breakdown <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-farm income sources.<br />

Charcoal production is the only developed source <strong>of</strong> natural-resource based <strong>of</strong>f-farm income for<br />

men, although in some areas, it is largely produced by specialist (non-farming) Sisala migrants.<br />

This lack <strong>of</strong> developed crafts based on natural resource utilisation is at odds with a common<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!