02.05.2014 Views

Poverty Dimensions of Public Governance and Forest Management ...

Poverty Dimensions of Public Governance and Forest Management ...

Poverty Dimensions of Public Governance and Forest Management ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40<br />

" The ecotone between semi-deciduous forest <strong>and</strong> forest-savanna mosaics has seen<br />

considerable transformation <strong>of</strong> cropping systems in recent years, particularly since the 1983<br />

bush fire. Cocoa (dominant in the 1960s) has since been replaced by maize <strong>and</strong> vegetables;<br />

maize is, however, also characteristic <strong>of</strong> the savanna mosaics which have long existed in the<br />

same area.<br />

The processes resulting in the historical formation <strong>of</strong> the savanna mosaics <strong>and</strong> the present<br />

transformation <strong>of</strong> moist semi-deciduous forest into grassl<strong>and</strong>-dominated areas are uncertain. It is<br />

not clear to what extent farming systems have altered the environment, <strong>and</strong> the extent to which a<br />

drier climate phase or even global climate change has impacted on the forest ecotone. More<br />

information is required on the similarities <strong>and</strong> differences in farming practices between former<br />

forest settlements in which cocoa was cultivated <strong>and</strong> which have now been transformed into<br />

maize, cassava <strong>and</strong> vegetable cropping areas, <strong>and</strong> the maize cropping areas in the savanna mosaic<br />

areas. Little is known either about the dynamics <strong>and</strong> long-term sustainability <strong>of</strong> maize cultivation<br />

within these two areas.<br />

Farming systems in Brong Ahafo are also competitive, seeking to establish a production niche in<br />

which they have a comparative advantage (or less <strong>of</strong> a disadvantage) on the market. The need to<br />

stay competitive has been intensified by structural adjustment, removal <strong>of</strong> subsidies <strong>and</strong><br />

competition with cheap imports <strong>of</strong> food crops. All this has led to erosion <strong>of</strong> prices. The incomes<br />

<strong>of</strong> urban people have also been depressed as a result <strong>of</strong> devaluation, unemployment, etc., <strong>and</strong> this<br />

has intensified the purchasing power constraint. When they fail to establish a comparative<br />

advantage, farmers respond by experimenting with new crops <strong>and</strong> shifting to new farming<br />

strategies.<br />

4.1.18 Agricultural research<br />

Surprisingly little research exists on the different niches that farmers occupy <strong>and</strong> the factors that<br />

define the boundaries between different farming systems. These factors tend to be overlooked by<br />

mainstream agricultural research when it lumps together different farming systems in allembracing<br />

categories, juxtaposing ‘traditional agriculture’ with ‘agricultural modernisation’.<br />

Localised farming systems need to be understood in their relationship to regional systems <strong>and</strong> the<br />

ways in which they accommodate or adapt to features <strong>of</strong> agricultural modernisation.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!