26.05.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248<br />

14.6 Taxonomic Confusion, Species Crypsis,<br />

and Morphological Plasticity<br />

W.M. Graham and K.M. Bayha<br />

Historical taxonomic confusion has often complicated initial efforts to study<br />

jellyfish invasions, and nowhere is that more true than in the case of the Black<br />

Sea ctenophore invasions. Initially, the Black Sea Mnemiopsis was identified<br />

alternatively as M. mccradyi (Zaika and Sergeeva 1990) or M. leidyi (Vinogradov<br />

et al. 1989), the two most recently recognized Mnemiopsis species.<br />

However, many doubted these terminologies (Seravin 1994; Harbison and<br />

Volovik 1994), and the validity of the two Mnemiopsis species has been questioned<br />

based on morphological grounds (Seravin 1994; Harbison and Volovik<br />

1994; Oliveira and Migotto 2006). A recent molecular study has indicated that<br />

one species exists worldwide, i.e., M. leidyi (Bayha 2005). Another notable<br />

example of such confusion is that of the ctenophore Beroë. The same name (B.<br />

ovata) had historically been used for two morphologically different animals<br />

(one from the western Atlantic and Caribbean, the other from the Mediterranean),<br />

and it was initially believed that Beroë may have invaded from the<br />

Mediterranean. However, both genetic (Bayha et al. 2004) and morphological<br />

(Seravin et al. 2002) evidence indicated that the invasive animal has a western<br />

Atlantic origin (eastern seaboard of the Americas and the Caribbean). Consequently,<br />

Bayha et al. (2004) proposed that, pending a thorough systematic<br />

revision of the genus Beroë, the species be termed Beroë ovata sensu Mayer<br />

(as opposed to the incorrect Beroë ovata Mayer 1912).<br />

Species crypsis and morphological plasticity can also hinder efforts to<br />

study invasive animals. Invasive patterns of Aurelia and Cassiopea are excellent<br />

examples of the problems associated with species crypsis. Neither invasion<br />

was fully appreciated until genetic techniques were employed (Greenberg<br />

et al. 1996; Holland et al. 2004; Dawson et al. 2005), because the invaders<br />

were historically confused with morphologically similar natives. Where<br />

species crypsis confuses multiple species for one, morphological plasticity<br />

may confound species invasion patterns by having only one invading species<br />

recognized as multiple others. This phenomenon has hindered studies of the<br />

invasion of Phyllorhiza punctata into the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere<br />

(Bolton and Graham 2004). Again, only molecular genetic approaches will<br />

allow us to fully unravel interrelationships between invasive jellyfish exhibiting<br />

morphological plasticity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!