26.05.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

372<br />

G. J. Hallman<br />

literature to describe host status; terms such as “rarely infested” are not helpful<br />

in defining host range.<br />

21.3.1.2 Systems Approach<br />

A systems approach to achieving quarantine security is “[t]he integration of<br />

different pest risk management measures, at least two of which act independently,<br />

and which cumulatively achieve the appropriate level of phytosanitary<br />

protection” (FAO 2004). Pest risk management measures are available options<br />

to reduce the risk of introduction of a pest, and may be applied at appropriate<br />

times when they will have an effect in reducing pest risk at any point from<br />

before a commodity is planted to before it arrives at market (Table 21.1).<br />

These measures usually form part of an official protocol that must be followed,<br />

and achieve a specific goal, such as maintain pest trapping numbers<br />

below a predetermined level. If that level is exceeded, then export may be<br />

halted until corrective measures restore risk to acceptable levels. Jang and<br />

Moffitt (1994) present a thorough discussion of the systems approach.<br />

Pre-plant or pre-season measures include those that define the pest prevalence<br />

in the area through trapping and sampling, host suitability, and the pest<br />

population level when susceptible stages of the host part to be exported are<br />

present. Off-season pest mitigation measures often must be carried out even<br />

though the commodity in its exported stage is not present. The use of attractants<br />

to detect and suppress pests is discussed by Robacker and Landolt<br />

(2002).<br />

During the growing stages when the exportable part of the commodity is<br />

present in the fields, attention is focused directly on preventing infestation of<br />

the commodity. Survey trapping may be increased, and toxic baits may be<br />

employed to keep population levels from exceeding the limit of tolerance.<br />

Field applications of pesticides may be employed.<br />

After harvest, the only methods for reducing pest infestation levels are<br />

culling of infested commodities, or a disinfestation treatment. If a disinfestation<br />

treatment is used as part of a systems approach to phytosanitary security,<br />

theoretically the treatment would not need to achieve the same level of control<br />

as a stand-alone phytosanitary treatment. Cowley et al. (1991) developed<br />

a methyl bromide fumigation treatment for watermelons that depended on<br />

the poor host status of watermelons, fruit fly control in the field, and culling<br />

of damaged, softened or misshapen fruit to reduce infestation levels of the<br />

fruit fly Bactrocera xanthodes to levels that would be controlled by a lower<br />

than usual dose of methyl bromide. For this scheme to be a true systems<br />

approach, each of the steps in the system would be precisely defined in the<br />

protocol.<br />

Although systems approaches avoid the expense of treatment, they require<br />

a continual expense of the pest risk management measures required to keep

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!