26.05.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

284<br />

C.R. Largiadèr<br />

than anadromous ones to introgression from genetically distinct lineages,<br />

including some lineages that had been isolated for more than a million years.<br />

By contrast, within major genetic lineages, anadromous populations appear to<br />

be more susceptible to introgression. In general, there is a great variability<br />

observed in the extent of introgression in different populations, ranging from<br />

hardly detectable introgression of exotic genes following several decades of<br />

intensive introductions (Largiadèr and Scholl 1996), to nearly complete displacement<br />

of the native gene pools (Largiadèr and Scholl 1995).<br />

Regarding the literature on anthropogenic introgressive hybridization in<br />

mammals, evidence of gene flow between domesticated varieties and wild<br />

conspecifics or closely related species seems to have particularly increased in<br />

the last few years. This involves, for example, the European wildcat (Felis silvestris<br />

silvestris) and domestic cats (F. s. catus; Beaumont et al. 2001; Lecis et<br />

al. 2006), domestic ferrets (Mustela furo) and the European polecat (M. putorius;<br />

Davison et al. 1999), wolves (Canis lupus) and domestic dogs (C. l. familiaris;<br />

Randi and Lucchini 2002; Vilà et al. 2003), coyotes (C. latrans) and dogs<br />

(Adams et al. 2003), bison (Bison bison) and domestic cattle (Bos taurus; Halbert<br />

et al. 2005), and other bovine species (Nijman et al. 2003).<br />

Although there is no systematic survey dealing specifically with maninduced<br />

inter- and intraspecific introgressive hybridization in plant species to<br />

assess the extent of these phenomena as a threat to native biological diversity,<br />

plants still represent probably the best-studied group in this context.Vilà et al.<br />

(2000) have recently compiled and reviewed a large number of human-mediated<br />

plant hybridizations, which encompass a wide range of taxonomic<br />

groups and the full range of potential outcomes, as described above for animal<br />

species. Also, the gene flow between domesticated and wild plant species<br />

has received increased attention since the advent of transgenics. A recent<br />

review reports that 12 of the world’s 13 most important crop species hybridize<br />

with wild relatives (Ellstrand et al. 2002), and substantial evidence has now<br />

been compiled that at least 48 cultivated plant taxa hybridize with one or<br />

more wild relatives somewhere in the world (Ellstrand 2003a, 2003b). Two further<br />

reviews focused on the extinction of rare species through hybridization<br />

with numerically superior invading species (Ellstrand and Elam 1993; Levin<br />

et al. 1996).Yet, there are also cases of small invading populations threatening<br />

larger populations of native species. For example, smooth cord grass<br />

(Spartina alterniflora), which was introduced into the salt marshes of San<br />

Francisco Bay in the mid-1970s, shows a much higher male fitness than does<br />

the native California cord grass (S. foliosa). This fitness difference seems to<br />

reverse the direction of gene flow, which would normally be expected to occur<br />

from the more abundant to the rarer taxon, and thus may ultimately lead to<br />

the extinction of the more widespread, abundant native species (S. foliosa)<br />

through progressive introgression of genes of the rare invader (S. alterniflora)<br />

into the native gene pool (Anttila et al. 1998).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!