26.05.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

374<br />

21.3.2 Phytosanitary Treatments<br />

G. J. Hallman<br />

Phytosanitary treatments are done directly to the commodity at some point<br />

before it is released to the market in the importing country or region to<br />

reduce the risk of infestation of that commodity by invasive species to acceptable<br />

levels. Virtually any physical, chemical, or biological technique that can<br />

be used to kill an organism or prevent its reproduction could theoretically be<br />

used as a phytosanitary treatment (Table 21.2). Commercially used treatments<br />

are limited by several concerns:<br />

1. The controlling factor must reach the organism, which may be inside the<br />

commodity with no easy access from the outside. For example, tephritid<br />

fruit fly and weevil (Curculionidae) larvae mine deep inside fruit and other<br />

plant parts with no opening to the outside of the plant, making their control<br />

more difficult than surface-infesting organisms.<br />

2. The level of control must be near 100 %. The risk of an imported commodity<br />

resulting in the establishment of an invasive species depends on, among<br />

other things, the infestation rate of the species in the commodity, shipment<br />

size, and level of treatment efficacy. Because it takes only one mating pair<br />

or one parthenogenic organism to start an infestation, the level of control<br />

should ensure that this does not occur within an appropriate margin of<br />

error. Landolt et al. (1984) were among the first to consider using pest risk<br />

to determine the necessary level of treatment efficacy, rather than setting<br />

the level arbitrarily high. Follett and McQuate (2001) review the intervening<br />

literature on this topic, and give citations for calculating pest risk associated<br />

with treatments, along with real-world examples.<br />

3. The treatment cannot harm the commodity significantly, or pose a health<br />

or environmental hazard.Virtually any physical treatment designed to kill<br />

organisms on fresh commodities, which are also alive, could harm or kill<br />

that commodity or accelerate decomposition and shorten shelf life. Biocidal<br />

chemical treatments may harm a live vegetative commodity, and are<br />

limited by health and environmental concerns. Many approved phytosanitary<br />

treatments cause some recognizable, albeit tolerable, damage to the<br />

commodity, and commercial interests should check tolerance of the items<br />

they wish to treat before investing in the treatment technology. More treatment<br />

options are available for durable commodities, such as bulk grain,<br />

lumber, hay, and tobacco, which are harder to damage than fresh produce.<br />

4. The treatment must be commercially viable from the standpoint of price<br />

and logistics. This criterion may not keep a phytosanitary treatment out of<br />

the regulations, but it will keep it from being used commercially for very<br />

long.<br />

Quarantine treatments are presented below in approximate chronological<br />

order of their development and commercial application.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!