26.05.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Genetically Modified Organisms as Invasive Species? 307<br />

it warns that, if selection is strong enough, then these indigenous strains will<br />

acquire beneficial traits.<br />

A study of potential gene flow between alien North American gooseberry<br />

species (resistant to the co-evolved American gooseberry mildew) and<br />

mildew-susceptible native British gooseberries provides a very similar picture.<br />

Hybrid seedlings containing resistance genes were found to have a selective<br />

advantage (Warren and James 2006), illustrating the potential for crop<br />

gene escape to alter the ecological behaviour of native British gooseberries in<br />

much the same way as does transgenic disease resistance. Furthermore, plants<br />

containing the alien genes supported significantly more, albeit smaller invertebrates.<br />

The key questions arising from these last two examples are the same as<br />

those we have discussed for transgenic organisms – what impact does the<br />

transgene target (for example, mildew) have on native populations, and what<br />

is the significance of the ‘unpredicted’ side effects of the introduced genes? We<br />

need to understand the mechanisms and impacts of naturally or deliberately<br />

introduced genes to predict the path of invasions. The principles and<br />

processes of gene flow, selection and invasion are essentially the same.<br />

Whether this results in significant changes in biodiversity or ecosystem function<br />

is yet to be documented, and the risk assessment of transgenic organisms<br />

remains to be resolved on a case-by-case basis.<br />

References<br />

Abrahams MV, Sutterlin A (1999) The foraging and antipredator behaviour of growthenhanced<br />

transgenic Atlantic salmon. Anim Behav 58:933–942<br />

Ankenbauer RG (1997) Reassessing forty years of genetic doctrine: retrotransfer and<br />

conjugation. Genetics 145:543–549<br />

Ashelford KE, Day MJ, Fry JC (1999) Elevated abundance of bacteriophage infecting bacteria<br />

in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:285–289<br />

Atlas RM (1984) Diversity in microbial communities. Adv Microb Ecol 7:1–47<br />

Bailey MJ, Kobayashi N, Lilley AK, Powell BJ, Thompson IP (1994) Potential for gene<br />

transfer in the phytosphere: isolation and characterisation of naturally occurring<br />

plasmids. In: Bazin MJ, Lynch JM (eds) Environmental gene release. Models, experiments<br />

and risk assessment. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 77–98<br />

Bailey MJ, Lilley AK, Thompson IP, Rainey PB, Ellis RJ (1995) Site directed chromosomal<br />

marking of a fluorescent pseudomonad isolated from the phytosphere of sugar beet;<br />

stability and potential for marker gene transfer. Mol Ecol 4:755–763<br />

Bailey MJ, Lilley AK, Ellis RJ, Bramwell PA, Thompson IP (1997) Microbial ecology, inoculant<br />

distribution, and gene flux within populations of bacteria colonizing the surface<br />

of plants: case study of a GMM field release in the United Kingdom. In: Van Elsas<br />

JD, Trevors JT, Wellington EMH (eds) Modern soil microbiology. Dekker, New York,<br />

pp 479–500<br />

Bergelson J, Purrington CB, Palm CJ, Lopez-Gutierrez JC (1996) Costs of resistance: a test<br />

using transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:1659–1663

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!