26.05.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

390<br />

P. Genovesi<br />

ing all the removal efforts. The ability of the species to establish and expand<br />

from a nucleus of very few individuals is thus another aspect to carefully take<br />

into account in eradications. For example, eradication of squirrel species is<br />

complicated by the ability of many species to establish and expand from a<br />

nucleus of only two or three pairs (Bertolino and Genovesi 2005).<br />

Nevertheless, analysing the target species’ life history may not be enough,<br />

as ecological interactions with other species can play a major role in the final<br />

outcomes of the eradication. For example, the eradication of rabbits from two<br />

islands of the Kerguelen archipelago led to an overall increase in plant species<br />

richness but also in the decline of some native species (Chapuis et al. 2004).<br />

Eradication of two introduced brushtail possums and brushtail rock wallabies<br />

from Rangitoto and Motutapu islands also resulted in a proliferation of several<br />

weed species (Mowbray 2002). In general, when eradications are carried<br />

out in areas invaded by more than one alien species, as in the case of islands<br />

with domestic cats, rats, and rabbits, eradication of superpredators (cats) may<br />

result in an explosion of mesopredators (rats), with the risk of aggravating<br />

impacts on native species. Conversely, eradication of rats can cause a shift of<br />

the diet of cats towards native species. Multi-species interactions also have<br />

effects on the feasibility of eradication: Courchamp and Sugihara (1999)<br />

showed that the removal of alien prey is in some cases an essential condition<br />

to successfully eradicate alien predators, because abundant prey populations<br />

may substantially limit the efficacy of predator removal efforts. Therefore,<br />

eradication planning requires also an understanding of the ecological interaction<br />

of the target species with other alien and native species and, in some<br />

cases, concurrent control of more than one alien species can be the best alternative.<br />

22.2.2 Lag Phase<br />

Biological invasions are often characterized by a lag phase followed by a rapid<br />

expansion (Williamson 1996), and this common pattern calls for starting<br />

eradications at the earliest possible stage, when the chances of successfully<br />

removing the infestation are highest. Prompt removal has been the key to success<br />

in the few cases of eradications of marine organisms attempted to date as<br />

well as eradications of freshwater fishes (e.g. Jackson et al. 2004), of the Canadian<br />

beaver from France (Rouland 1995) and of alien plants (Rejmánek and<br />

Pitcairn 2002). On the contrary, when the start of control activities is delayed,<br />

eradication often becomes impractical (e.g. the American grey squirrel;<br />

Bertolino and Genovesi 2003).<br />

The case of Caulerpa taxifolia is paradigmatic of the need to adopt a precautionary<br />

approach when addressing alien species. This alien alga was accidentally<br />

detected in 1984 in France when the invaded area covered only 1 m 2 ;<br />

by 1989, this had increased to 3 ha, and to 31 ha by 1991. Response was delayed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!