26.05.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

276<br />

C.R. Largiadèr<br />

Number of Publications<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

1956-60<br />

1961-65<br />

1966-70<br />

1971-75<br />

1976-80<br />

1981-85<br />

1986-90<br />

1991-95<br />

1996-00<br />

2001-05<br />

Fig. 16.1 Development of<br />

natural and anthropogenic<br />

hybridization<br />

and introgression as<br />

research topics. The literature<br />

search was carried<br />

out in the Web of<br />

Science (Thomson Scientific)<br />

citation database,<br />

using the search<br />

string ‘hybridization and<br />

introgression’<br />

Years<br />

and species are defined also strongly influences the perception of the problem.<br />

Recently, Mallet (2005) reviewed studies of natural interspecific hybridization<br />

in plants and a variety of animals. He estimated that at least 25 % of plant<br />

species, and 10 % of animal species are involved in hybridization and potential<br />

introgression with other species. Plants seem more prone to hybridization<br />

than are animals. However, this difference may at least partly be due to the different<br />

historical attitudes of botanists and zoologists toward hybridization,<br />

which resulted possibly in greater attention being paid to this phenomenon<br />

by botanists (Dowling and Secor 1997). While botanists viewed hybridization<br />

and introgression as important processes in adaptive evolution (Rieseberg<br />

1997), zoologists have tended to see them rather as problems being the converse<br />

of reproductive isolation, and thus challenging the ‘reality’ of biological<br />

species. However, there is increasing evidence that hybridization and introgression<br />

have also played an important role in the evolution of animals (Grant<br />

and Grant 1996; Dowling and Secor 1997). Taking into account the potential<br />

evolutionary importance of these processes changes considerably how we<br />

may perceive them in the context of biological invasions, e.g., that they may<br />

act as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in transplanted species (Ellstrand<br />

and Schierenbeck 2000).<br />

In this chapter, I intend to give a non-exhaustive overview on the empirical<br />

evidence of hybridization and introgression in the context of biological invasions.<br />

When any two taxa hybridize, the outcome of this event is difficult to<br />

generalize, and is modulated by many interacting external (e.g., habitat modifications)<br />

and evolutionary factors (e.g., mate preferences, heterosis etc.): the<br />

two taxa can merge completely, forming a ‘hybrid swarm’ leading to the<br />

extinction of the native taxon, which is replaced by a single mongrel species.<br />

Hybridization can be asymmetrical, i.e., genes introgress directionally from<br />

one taxon into the gene pool of the other, and hence lead to an acceleration of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!