25.06.2014 Views

SCI Regulation 28 Statement of Consultation - Scarborough ...

SCI Regulation 28 Statement of Consultation - Scarborough ...

SCI Regulation 28 Statement of Consultation - Scarborough ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Draft <strong>SCI</strong> Ref Consultee Organisation Q6: Y/N/NR Q6 Comments Q6 Councils Response<br />

D<strong>SCI</strong>0030 Alison Munday Government Office for NR<br />

Yorkshire and The<br />

Humber<br />

D<strong>SCI</strong>0031 Rose Freeman The Theatres Trust NR<br />

D<strong>SCI</strong>0032 Rachael Pierce Royal Mail Holdings, NR<br />

c/o Sanderson<br />

Weatherall<br />

D<strong>SCI</strong>0033 Andrew T<strong>of</strong>t Accent Yorkshire Ltd NR<br />

D<strong>SCI</strong>0034 Whitby Town Council YES What is described rarely happens in the Northern No statutory basis to do this and would<br />

Area. Revised plans should be dealt with the same prevent the Council from meeting<br />

way as the standard planning procedure - all Government prescribed targets; i.e. missing<br />

interested parties should see the revised plans Committees and delaying applications for a<br />

more than 48 hours prior to a meeting.<br />

further month. Amended plans are consulted<br />

on where time permits.<br />

D<strong>SCI</strong>0035 c/o Daniel Brown, GL Tesco Stores Ltd NR<br />

Hearn<br />

D<strong>SCI</strong>0036 Kate Berry Countryside Agency NR<br />

D<strong>SCI</strong>0037 c/o Andrew Brown, Persimmon Homes NO 1) Strategy for pre-application consultation is 1) Pre-application consultation will be<br />

Dunlop Haywards (York) unclear. covered in the proposed document which will<br />

2) It encourages developers to approach Council be available in draft by summer 2006.<br />

for pre-application discussions but does not state 2) <strong>Statement</strong> is not clear and will be<br />

that the Council will provide useful comment. The amended. Para 6.3.2 refers to early public<br />

statement that Officers and Members will not involvement at which time it is important for<br />

express an opinion on development proposals at Members and Officers to take a back seat and<br />

pre-application stage (para 6.3.2) is inappropriate not direct public feeling. Officers will<br />

and contrary to PPS12 objectives. This will not continue to provide advice in pre-application<br />

encourage developers to undertake pre-application meetings between the developer and the<br />

consultation.<br />

Council. Para 6.3.2 changed to - "Although<br />

Planning Officers and Members may attend<br />

such consultation exercises, the initial<br />

dialogue at these community events must be<br />

with the communitydevelopers. Though<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers and Members may be required to<br />

provide factual information (for example on<br />

relevant policy issues) will not make a<br />

judgement orthey should not express an<br />

opinion on any given scheme at this stage in<br />

order for the local community and other<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!